IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiiy2025i3p32-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Informational Support for Benchmarking in the Context of the Knowledge Management

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Szydelko
  • Lukasz Szydelko

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the article was to identify the potential for applying benchmarking to support the implementation of knowledge management strategies in organisations. Design/Methodology/Approach: The main research methods applied were the analysis of literature sources and deductive reasoning. These methods enabled the reconstruction of knowledge derived from the reviewed literature and supported the formulation of conclusions relevant to the research objective. Findings: The article addresses the issue of informational support for benchmarking within the framework of the knowledge management concept, arguing that benchmarking should be regarded as an essential component of systems for managing this critical resource in contemporary organisations. Potential sources of data and information for both internal and external benchmarking were identified across the four stages of the benchmarking process. Furthermore, the article highlights the applicability of the triangulation principle, primarily involving data and information, benchmarking specialists, and methods supporting benchmarking within the analysed process. Practical implications: The research findings have implications for both management theory and managerial practice. Benchmarking should be considered an integral component of knowledge management systems for organisations aiming to effectively manage this resource and achieve measurable benefits. It can effectively support the implementation of knowledge management strategies focused on both internal knowledge dissemination and external knowledge absorption. Originality/Value: The authors identified a research gap and endeavoured to address three research questions. The article fills a missing perspective in the literature. The conclusions may be utilised by both practitioners and theorists in the area of informational support for benchmarking in the context of the knowledge management.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Szydelko & Lukasz Szydelko, 2025. "Informational Support for Benchmarking in the Context of the Knowledge Management," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 32-48.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:3:p:32-48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/4031/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elnathan, Dan & Kim, Oliver, 1995. "Partner selection and group formation in cooperative benchmarking," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2-3), pages 345-364, April.
    2. Sanjay Mohapatra, 2012. "Information Theory and Best Practices in the IT Industry," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4614-3043-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Art Durnev & Claudine Mangen, 2009. "Corporate Investments: Learning from Restatements," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 47(3), pages 679-720, June.
    2. Irina PETROVA, 2021. "Awareness And Utilisation Of The Benchmarking Approach By The Production Enterprises From North Bulgaria," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 220-230, November.
    3. Ferracuti, Elia & Stubben, Stephen R., 2019. "The role of financial reporting in resolving uncertainty about corporate investment opportunities," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2).
    4. Magdalena Szydełko, 2022. "Ocena klasyfikacji i typologii benchmarkingu z wykorzystaniem warunków poprawności podziału logicznego pojęć," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 4, pages 79-90.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:3:p:32-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.