Considerations Regarding the Structure, Significance and Trend of Monetary Indicators in Romania and in the Eurosystem
The present paper aims at achieving a comparative analysis of the structure of monetary aggregates, according to the definitions used by the European Central Bank and the National Bank of Romania, respectively. The relevance of such a comparison is justified by the changes adopted by the monetary authority from Romania at the beginning of 2007 in what regards the structure of aggregates M1, M2 and M3. The paper expresses opinions on the effectiveness and impact of monetary strategies implemented by the two monetary authorities, namely the two-pillar strategy used by the European Central Bank and the direct inflation targeting strategy implemented by the National Bank of Romania.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Oana Gherghinescu & Gheorghe Gherghinescu, 2008.
"Considerations Regarding the Structure, Significance and Trend of Monetary Indicators in Romania and in the Eurosystem,"
European Research Studies Journal,
European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 63-70.
- Oana GHERGHINESCU & Gheorghe GHERGHINESCU & Mirela CRISTEA, 2008. "Considerations regarding the structure, significance and trend of monetary indicators in Romania and in the Eurosystem," Annals of University of Craiova - Economic Sciences Series, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 2(36), pages 781-787, may.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xi:y:2008:i:4:p:63-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Eleni Giannakopoulou)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.