IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Division of Labour in European Monetary Union: Absolute Versus Comparative Advantage


  • Mariolis, Th.


It is accepted that the stability and effectiveness of European Monetary Union (EMU) is now decisively dependent on the introduction of the greatest possible flexibility into the labour market. This, of course, entails in the long-term a fundamental change in the European division of labour: Namely, it will no longer be governed by the law of comparative advantage, but rather by the law of absolute advantage. If the real economic world was adequately described by the usual Ricardian model of international trade, then the aforesaid change would set in motion strong processes of unequal development between countries and regions. In this paper we investigate whether the conclusions that emerge from the usual Ricardian model retain their validity within the context of more realistic models (i.e. existence of reproduced means of production and joint production). The general conclusion to be drawn from this investigation is the following: The existence of processes of unequal development cannot be excluded. However, the concepts and propositions of traditional theory do not help to identify those evolutions which take place in economic reality. Consequently, any further discussion, at both a theoretical and empirical level, should begin with this given.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariolis, Th., 2000. "The Division of Labour in European Monetary Union: Absolute Versus Comparative Advantage," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1-2), pages 79-90, January -.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:iii:y:2000:i:1-2:p:79-90

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Mariolis, Theodore & Katsinos, Apostolis, 2011. "Return to devalued drachma, cost-push inflation and international competitiveness," MPRA Paper 35413, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:iii:y:2000:i:1-2:p:79-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marios Agiomavritis). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.