IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/erp/eiopxx/p0038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Social Construction of the Acquis Communautaire: A Cornerstone of the European Edifice

Author

Listed:
  • Jorgensen, Knud Erik

Abstract

The acquis communautaire is almost always (self-re)presented as a rock hard principle, as something applicant countries have to adapt to. Employing a Nietzsche-Foucauldian genealogical method, the paper explores an important instance of intersubjectivity of meaning among European integrators, or, in concrete terms, the genealogy of the acquis . The paper explores how the acquis has become such a powerful non-negotiable condition for accession and traces one origin of the acquis back to the early 1960s, to the first round of (failed) negotiations on enlargement. The paper argues that currently there are at least two meanings of the acquis : (i) a political principle and, (ii) a legal principle, constituting a crucial aspect of constitutionalization in the European Union. Finally, the paper concludes that despite various direct political attacks, and despite the worries of several scholars, the acquis seems not at all to be an endangered principle.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorgensen, Knud Erik, 1999. "The Social Construction of the Acquis Communautaire: A Cornerstone of the European Edifice," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 3, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-005a.htm
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-005.htm
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/1999-005.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christiansen, Thomas & Jorgensen, Knud Erik, 1999. "The Amsterdam Process: A Structurationist Perspective on EU Treaty Reform," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 3, January.
    2. Price, Richard, 1995. "A genealogy of the chemical weapons taboo," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(1), pages 73-103, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T. V. Paul, 1995. "Nuclear Taboo And War Initiation in Regional Conflicts," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 39(4), pages 696-717, December.
    2. Matthew Bolton & Elizabeth Minor, 2016. "The Discursive Turn Arrives in Turtle Bay: The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons’ Operationalization of Critical IR Theories," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(3), pages 385-395, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Assistant (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.