Author
Listed:
- Khadiza Akter
(Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh)
- Shaikh Abdus Sabur
(Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh)
- Atia Shrmin Ame
(Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh)
- Md Monjurul Islam
(Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh)
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the supply chain of potatoes and determine the factors affecting postharvest losses of potatoes at the producer level of Bangladesh. Data were collected through a face-to-face interview schedule from a sample of total 60- 30 farmers, 6 wholesalers, 5 aratdars, 5 retailers, and 14 consumers in Sirajdikhan and Sadar Upazila of Munshiganj district. Descriptive statistics (percentages, frequencies, etc.) and multiple linear regression analysis were used for this study. The result shows that channel 4 is the longest marketing chain in the study area which includes the marketing actors – farmers, aratdars, wholesalers, retailers, and consumers. In the supply chain of potatoes, the amount of postharvest loss is 6.6% for the producer’s level, 5.3% for the wholesale level, 1.10% for the aratdar level, and 2.1% for the retailer level in the study area. The regression model reveals that age and amount of production have a significant positive relationship, while experience has a significant negative relationship with the postharvest losses of potatoes. The study also shows that lack of storage facility (48.94%) and poor packaging system (32.73%) are the major reasons for occurring postharvest losses of potatoes. The farmers and intermediaries suggested that it is necessary to identify the maturity stage of potatoes at harvesting time (70%), improve the cold storage facility (56.67%), and improve the loading and unloading system (56.25%), etc. for reducing postharvest losses of potato.
Suggested Citation
Khadiza Akter & Shaikh Abdus Sabur & Atia Shrmin Ame & Md Monjurul Islam, 2022.
"Postharvest Losses along the Supply Chain of Potato in Bangladesh: A Micro-Level Study,"
European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 4(2), pages 67-72, March.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejfood:v:4:y:2022:i:2:id:20451
DOI: 10.24018/ejfood.2022.4.2.451
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejfood:v:4:y:2022:i:2:id:20451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editor-in-Chief (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejfood .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.