IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejfood/v3y2021i2id20262.html

Evaluation of Antibiotic Sensitivity Against Bacterial Diseases Prevalent in Commercial Poultry Farm in Western Part of Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Aurangazeb Kabir

    (University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh)

  • Most. Sabina Yasmin

    (University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Golam Sarwar

    (University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Obaidullah Al Masum

    (University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh)

  • Soshe Ahmed

    (University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh)

  • Mohammad Mahbubur Rahman

    (University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh)

Abstract

A surge in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a major concern. The indiscriminate use of antibiotics in poultry farming, increased consumption of poultry products containing antimicrobial residues is likely to hasten the development of multidrug resistance in pathogens, as well as in commensal organisms. To substantiate our knowledge on the status of AMR to the Neomycin, Gentamicin, Levofloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, Doxycycline, Sulfonamide, Amoxicillin and Cephalexin, commonly being used in poultry farms in Rajshahi city (Western Part) of Bangladesh a cross sectional study was carried out using conventional Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique. We tried to identify sensitivity of the stated antibiotics against bacterial samples obtained from 30 liver samples of live birds out of which 24 were layer and 6 were broiler from 10 commercial poultry farms. In our study, we observed that Cephalexin, Neomycin, Gentamicin and Levofloxacin retain superior antimicrobial potency at the rate of 33.33%, 23.33%, 20%, and 23.33% respectively. Moreover, Levofloxacin started to show quite (70%) to moderate (6.67%) sensitivity and Neomycin (76.67%), Gentamicin (80%) Cephalexin (33.33%) show only quite sensitivity indicating exacerbation of existing antimicrobial resistance through gradually losing their affectivity against microbial infections. On the other hand, during our observation Ciprofloxacin (33.33%), Amoxicillin (20%), Doxycycline (6.67%) and Sulfonamides (3.33%) were found having no sensitivity at all, however, these drugs still being considered as drug of choice for commercial flocks to treat microbial infection. Farmers ‘knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the use of antibiotics have to be fully compliant in line with manufacturers’ recommendations to reduce risk to public health. This study was, therefore, conducted to collect baseline data on the regularly used antibiotics in poultry production and to provide a greater understanding of the potential impact of antimicrobial resistance on public health.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurangazeb Kabir & Most. Sabina Yasmin & Md. Golam Sarwar & Md. Obaidullah Al Masum & Soshe Ahmed & Mohammad Mahbubur Rahman, 2021. "Evaluation of Antibiotic Sensitivity Against Bacterial Diseases Prevalent in Commercial Poultry Farm in Western Part of Bangladesh," European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 3(2), pages 69-76, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejfood:v:3:y:2021:i:2:id:20262
    DOI: 10.24018/ejfood.2021.3.2.262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejfood/article/view/20262
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejfood/article/download/20262/4988
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejfood.2021.3.2.262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejfood:v:3:y:2021:i:2:id:20262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editor-in-Chief (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejfood .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.