Author
Listed:
- Lloyd Mbulwe
(Zambia Agriculture Research Institute, Zambia)
- Mukachikwikwi Hamakoko
(Natural Resources Development College, Zambia)
- George Mhango
(Natural Resources Development College, Zambia)
- Mathew Moonga
(Natural Resources Development College, Zambia)
- Hezel Syankwede
(Natural Resources Development College, Zambia)
Abstract
Sorghum has a high similarity to maize and therefore a good substitute for maize based diets in poultry stock-feed. Additionally, sorghum is processed just like maize in both dry and wet milling techniques. Nonetheless, a general misconception in Zambia is that all sorghums have anti-quality factors (tannins). This misconception may have resulted in its underutilisation in poultry feed in Zambia. However, various tannin free varieties and hybrids developed by the Sorghum & Millets Improvement Programme are available in Zambia. Kuyuma, a tannin free white sorghum variety was used to determine the suitability of using non-tannin white sorghum varieties in quail feed. In this study a maize-based stock-feed diet for quails was substituted with sorghum at four levels: 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% in quail meat production. This was followed by measuring: (i) The weekly feed intake, (ii) The weekly gain in body weight and (iii) The weekly feed conversion ratio of quails.The performance of quails fed on a maize-based diet was identical to quails fed on a sorghum-based diet at nearly all levels of substitution. The conversion ratios of maize and sorghum were also similar. Non-tannin white sorghums like Kuyuma can effectively substitute maize in quail diets. Utilising sorghum in poultry diets could increase its social-economic value and help to reduce the cost of producing meat.
Suggested Citation
Lloyd Mbulwe & Mukachikwikwi Hamakoko & George Mhango & Mathew Moonga & Hezel Syankwede, 2020.
"Effect of Substituting Maize Based Stock-feed Diets with Sorghum on the Performance of Quails,"
European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 2(5), September.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejfood:v:2:y:2020:i:5:id:20115
DOI: 10.24018/ejfood.2020.2.5.115
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejfood:v:2:y:2020:i:5:id:20115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editor-in-Chief (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejfood .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.