IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejfood/v2y2020i3id20062.html

Climatic risk adaptation strategies by smallholder livestock farmers in Eastern Amhara Region, Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Habtemariam Assefa

    (Makerere University, Uganda.)

  • Paul Kibwika

    (Makerere University, Uganda.)

  • Florence Birungi Kyazze

    (Makerere University, Uganda.)

  • Zeleke Mekuriaw

    (Makerere University, Uganda.)

  • Fred Kalanzi

    (Makerere University, Uganda.)

Abstract

The study was conducted to analyze the predominant climatic risks and the strategies livestock farmers used to adapt climatic risks in Eastern Amhara Region of Ethiopia. Cross-sectional research design was used with mixed quantitative and qualitative research approach. The data were collected from 317 livestock farmers using household survey; and FGDs, key informant interviews and personal observation for complementation. The data were analyzed using STATA (version-14) and SPSS (version 23) software. The result shows that, 79.8% of livestock farmers were affected by different climatic risks over the period of 2009-2018. They were affected by drought, animal disease outbreak (ADOB), flood and frost. The percentage of the farmers affected by climatic risks have been fluctuating from year to years but the trends show increased over the last ten years. Every year, 6.7%, 6.8%, 6.4% and 3.6% of livestock farmers were affected by drought, frost, animal disease outbreak (ADOB) and flood, respectively. Seasonally, livestock farmers impacted by drought, flood and frost in autumn, summer and spring, respectively. Animal disease outbreak has occurred in all seasons but higher in autumn. The perception of the farmers was measured based on the frequencies of climatic risks occurrences and the severity level of their impacts. Majority of the farmers perceived that the frequencies of droughts (49.8%) and frosts (43.2%) increased over the last ten years; whereas flood (68.8%) and ADOB (67.5%) decreased. The impacts of drought and ADOB were found at moderate level of severity with the value of 2.2 and 1.8 WAI, respectively; whereas frost and flood at lower severity level, which accounts for 1.4 and 1.3 WAI values, respectively. Saving surplus feed (99.4%), using modern animal healthcare (91.8%), conserving soil and water resources (70.8%) and improving/ customizing animal shelters/shades (60.3%); and keeping stress resistance breeds (52.7%) were major strategies for livestock farmers to adapt to climatic risks. These findings imply that drought and ADOB are the predominant climatic risks for livestock farmers in Eastern Amhra Region. Drought majorly occur in autumn; whereas ADOBs occur throughout the year. The farmers also use multiple strategies to adapt to the diverse impacts of the risks. However, the farmers are still vulnerable to the risks and remaining in food insecure. To be the farmers more effective, therefore, the existing adaptation strategies should be supported with science and technology to create stress resistance breeds, improve the quality and availability of feeds and animal health management.

Suggested Citation

  • Habtemariam Assefa & Paul Kibwika & Florence Birungi Kyazze & Zeleke Mekuriaw & Fred Kalanzi, 2020. "Climatic risk adaptation strategies by smallholder livestock farmers in Eastern Amhara Region, Ethiopia," European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 2(3), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejfood:v:2:y:2020:i:3:id:20062
    DOI: 10.24018/ejfood.2020.2.3.62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejfood/article/view/20062
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejfood/article/download/20062/4872
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejfood.2020.2.3.62?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejfood:v:2:y:2020:i:3:id:20062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editor-in-Chief (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejfood .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.