Author
Listed:
- Simon Wambuu Wanjiku
(Department of Educational Foundations, School of Education and Lifelong Learning, Kenyatta University, Kenya)
- Francis Murira Ndichu
(Department of Educational Foundations, School of Education and Lifelong Learning, Kenyatta University, Kenya)
- Edward Maina Andafu
(Department of Educational Foundations, School of Education and Lifelong Learning, Kenyatta University, Kenya)
Abstract
Teachers’ appraisal is key to enhancing their professionalism, which translates to effective curriculum implementation. This paper sought to evaluate the Teachers Performance Appraisal and Development (TPAD) process in Kenya with a view to identifying its challenges and suggesting ways of enhancing it. The study took a philosophical approach, subjecting the teachers’ appraisal process to criticism in light of the Socratic Pedagogical theory. The study established eleven errors that riddle the teachers’ appraisal process. These are the errors of strictness, leniency, central tendency, halo effect, recency of events, failure by participants to identify professional development gaps, failure by participants to attend the appraisal meetings, subjectivity nature of the TPAD appraisal process, alienation of some participants from the appraisal process and passive participation of some participants.The study utilized the six tenets of Socratic Pedagogy (participatory, dialectical, conversational, inquisitive, rational and practical tenets), interpreted to constitute the soul of the TPAD appraisal process, to fix the aforementioned errors. Therefore, the study recommended that the TPAD online system be reconfigured so that the appraisal process could be in tandem with the soul of the appraisal process.
Suggested Citation
Simon Wambuu Wanjiku & Francis Murira Ndichu & Edward Maina Andafu, 2024.
"A Critique of the Teachers’ Performance Appraisal and Development Tool of Evaluation in Kenya with Reference to the Socratic Pedagogy,"
European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, European Open Science, vol. 5(3), pages 74-81, May.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejedu0:v:5:y:2024:i:3:id:30846
DOI: 10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.3.846
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejedu0:v:5:y:2024:i:3:id:30846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejedu .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.