IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejedu0/v4y2023i1id30507.html

Assessment of the Methods of Testing Clinical Competence of Nursing Students in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Olatunbosun J. Aborisade

    (Ekiti State University, Nigeria)

  • Olubunmi A. Akinwumiju

    (Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Nigeria)

Abstract

The study assessed the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and Traditional Practical Examination (TPE) methods of testing Nursing Students’ Clinical competence in Nigeria by examining the strengths and weaknesses of OSCE and TPE as perceived by Nurse Educators and Nursing Students in Osun State, Nigeria. Descriptive research design of the survey type was used in the study. The population of the study comprised Seven Hundred and Fifteen (715) Nursing Students and Seventy-Five (75) Nurse Educators in Private and Public Nursing Institutions in Osun State, Nigeria. A sample of Three Hundred and Eighteen (318) participants was used which consisted of Two Hundred and Eighty-Eight (288) Nursing Students and Thirty (30) Nurse Educators drawn from Public and Private Nursing Institutions in Osun State, Nigeria using a multi-stage sampling procedure. Two research instruments were used to collect data for the study which were: Questionnaire on Students’ Assessment (QSA) administered to the students, and Questionnaires on Teachers’ Assessment (QTA) administered to the Nurse Educators. Validity of the instruments was ensured using expert judgment while the reliability of the instruments was estimated using the Cronbach Alpha reliability method. The reliability coefficients of QSA and QTA were 0.87 and 0.84 respectively. Two Research questions were raised, and two hypotheses were formulated for the study. Frequency counts and percentages were used to answer the research questions while the hypotheses were tested using a student’s t-test at 0.05 level of significance. The findings of the study indicated that the students perceived that OSCE has more strengths than TPE while Nursing Educators were of the view that the two methods complement each other. Based on the findings of the study, it is concluded that each of the methods has its weaknesses and strengths, and therefore, it is recommended that the two methods should be jointly used in training and testing Nursing students’ clinical competence in Nigeria.

Suggested Citation

  • Olatunbosun J. Aborisade & Olubunmi A. Akinwumiju, 2023. "Assessment of the Methods of Testing Clinical Competence of Nursing Students in Nigeria," European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, European Open Science, vol. 4(1), pages 67-72, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejedu0:v:4:y:2023:i:1:id:30507
    DOI: 10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.1.507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejedu/article/view/30507
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejedu/article/download/30507/5955
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.1.507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejedu0:v:4:y:2023:i:1:id:30507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejedu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.