Author
Listed:
- Cristiano Mauro Assis Gomes
(Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.)
- Jhonys de Araujo
(Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.)
- Enio Galinkin Jelihovschi
(Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Brazil.)
Abstract
The theory of students’ approaches to learning makes direct contributions to the teaching-learning process. For instance, it provides a conceptual repertoire that helps improve the teacher’s pedagogical practice and the student’s self-assessment of their own learning. Despite its contributions, the field of approaches has an important limitation: the measurement of its constructs is carried out exclusively by self-report tests. Although these measures have brought advances to the field, self-report is permeated by important biases that impair the quality of measurement. Considering this limitation, the Laboratory for Cognitive Architecture Research (LAICO) has initiated an agenda to develop performance-based tests for the measurement of approaches. The Approach-in-Process Test Version 2 is part of this agenda. It is a performance-based test that measures approach in the context of school/academic learning. In addition to the performance-based measurement, the test has two self-report measurements. The first measures the student’s perception of the impact of certain lessons on his or her deep approach to learning. The second measures the student’s perception of how often he or she manifests the deep approach to learning. The test items for the self-report measurements are multiple choice, while the items for the performance measure are open-ended in nature and require a correction guide. This paper presents, for the first time, the Correction Guide for the Approach-in-Process Test Version 2. In this paper, all the structural components of the correction guide are shown as well as its application to the specific content “we have no direct access to reality” taught in a particular university discipline. Applications of the Correction Guide in other teaching contents will be presented in future publications. They will show that the Approach-in-Process Test Version 2 can be applied and corrected in the diversity of school/academic contents.
Suggested Citation
Cristiano Mauro Assis Gomes & Jhonys de Araujo & Enio Galinkin Jelihovschi, 2022.
"Presentation of the Correction Guide for the Approach-in-Process Test Version 2 and Its Application in the Content of “We Don’t Have Direct Access to Reality,"
European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, European Open Science, vol. 3(6), pages 112-123, October.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejedu0:v:3:y:2022:i:6:id:30497
DOI: 10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.6.497
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejedu0:v:3:y:2022:i:6:id:30497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejedu .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.