Author
Listed:
- Stella N. Nwosu
(University of Uyo, Nigeria.)
- Rebecca U. Etiubon
(University of Uyo, Nigeria.)
- Ijeoma B. Ofem
(University of Uyo, Nigeria.)
Abstract
This study investigated the Basic Science and Technology (BST) students’ reaction to the use of the Activity-Based Learning (ABL) approach, recently introduced by the Nigeria Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC) in Primary schools; and the influence of the ABL approach has on the BST students’ non-cognitive outcomes. The study used a survey and posttest only quasi-experimental design. Three research questions and two hypotheses guided it. The study population was 2,800 BST students of the 56 teachers who participated in the ABL teaching workshop. Three hundred and eighty students of twenty proportionately selected teachers from the state's three districts who used the ABL approach formed the experimental group. Another one hundred and fifty students who were not exposed to ABL were used as the control group. The ABL students answered the “Basic Science and Technology Students’ Non-Cognitive Outcome Questionnaire” (BSTSNCOQ), which elicited students’ responses on their learning experiences and non-cognitive outcomes based on the ABL approach. The students were highly satisfied with the ABL approach; there is a significant advancement in the non-cognitive outcomes/skills of the students, especially in meta cognitive strategies. The study concluded that using the ABL approach in teaching BST subjects can engender advancement in students’ non-cognitive outcomes/skills. The BST teachers in the state are recommended to be continuously trained, retrained, mentored and monitored in applying the ABL approach. The study has revealed the underlying, un-measured gains in using effective instructional techniques such as the ABL approach.
Suggested Citation
Stella N. Nwosu & Rebecca U. Etiubon & Ijeoma B. Ofem, 2022.
"Effect of the Activity-Based Learning on Basic Science and Technology Students’ Non-Cognitive Skills in South-South Nigeria,"
European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, European Open Science, vol. 3(5), pages 67-74, September.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejedu0:v:3:y:2022:i:5:id:30440
DOI: 10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.5.440
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejedu0:v:3:y:2022:i:5:id:30440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejedu .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.