IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejedu0/v2y2021i3id30142.html

Can “Debate” Transform Teaching and Learning in Higher Education?

Author

Listed:
  • Eleftheria Argyropoulou

    (University of Crete, Greece)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine post-graduate students’ perceptions, feelings, attitudes, and evaluation comments of a debate process they experienced in an Educational Policy, Management and Leadership module during their M.A.(Ed.) studies at a well-known Greek university. Furthermore, it aspires to share the perspective of broadening the teaching methodology in Higher Education using level-appropriate and widely appreciated teaching tools. The study was based on a qualitative design. Findings indicated the benefits gained through the learner-centered structured debate approach emphasized on the development of students’ critical, analytical, and communicational skills and stressed their gradual transformation of attitudes. Respondents also stressed active learning and self-driven study, as opposed to the passive learning attained during lectures. Participants’ positive feelings constitute the vehicle to the formation and/or transformation of attitudes and the implications of these transformations for their personal and professional life.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleftheria Argyropoulou, 2021. "Can “Debate” Transform Teaching and Learning in Higher Education?," European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, European Open Science, vol. 2(3), pages 178-185, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejedu0:v:2:y:2021:i:3:id:30142
    DOI: 10.24018/ejedu.2021.2.3.142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejedu/article/view/30142
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejedu/article/download/30142/5688
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejedu.2021.2.3.142?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejedu0:v:2:y:2021:i:3:id:30142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejedu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.