IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejece0/v5y2021i1id19265.html

EEG Channel Selection Using A Modified Grey Wolf Optimizer

Author

Listed:
  • Hussien Rezk Hussien
  • El-Sayed M. El-Kenawy
  • Ali I. El-Desouky

Abstract

Consider an increasingly growing field of research, Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is to form a direct channel of communication between a computer and the brain. However, extracting features of random time-varying EEG signals and their classification is a major challenge that faces current BCI. This paper proposes a modified grey wolf optimizer (MGWO) that can select optimal EEG channels to be used in (BCIs), the way that identifies main features and the immaterial ones from that dataset and the complexity to be removed. This allows (MGWO) to opt for optimal EEG channels as well as helping machine learning classification in its tasks when doing training to the classifier with the dataset. (MGWO), which imitates the grey wolves leadership and hunting manner nature and which consider metaheuristics swarm intelligence algorithms, is an integration with two modification to achieve the balance between exploration and exploitation the first modification applies exponential change for the number of iterations to increase search space accordingly exploitation, the second modification is the crossover operation that is used to increase the diversity of the population and enhance exploitation capability. Experimental results use four different EEG datasets BCI Competition IV- dataset 2a, BCI Competition IV- data set III, BCI Competition II data set III, and EEG Eye State from UCI Machine Learning Repository to evaluate the quality and effectiveness of the (MGWO). A cross-validation method is used to measure the stability of the (MGWO).

Suggested Citation

  • Hussien Rezk Hussien & El-Sayed M. El-Kenawy & Ali I. El-Desouky, 2021. "EEG Channel Selection Using A Modified Grey Wolf Optimizer," European Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, European Open Science, vol. 5(1), pages 17-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejece0:v:5:y:2021:i:1:id:19265
    DOI: 10.24018/ejece.2021.5.1.265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejece/article/view/19265
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejece/article/download/19265/11153
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejece.2021.5.1.265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kendrick N. Kay & Thomas Naselaris & Ryan J. Prenger & Jack L. Gallant, 2008. "Identifying natural images from human brain activity," Nature, Nature, vol. 452(7185), pages 352-355, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiacheng Zhang & Haolan Zhang, 2025. "Towards Human-like Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Anthropomorphic Computing in AI and Future Trends," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-49, June.
    2. Umut Güçlü & Marcel A J van Gerven, 2014. "Unsupervised Feature Learning Improves Prediction of Human Brain Activity in Response to Natural Images," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-12, August.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0020801 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Guillermo A Cecchi & Lejian Huang & Javeria Ali Hashmi & Marwan Baliki & María V Centeno & Irina Rish & A Vania Apkarian, 2012. "Predictive Dynamics of Human Pain Perception," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-12, October.
    5. Zvi N. Roth & Kendrick Kay & Elisha P. Merriam, 2022. "Natural scene sampling reveals reliable coarse-scale orientation tuning in human V1," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Hamed Nili & Cai Wingfield & Alexander Walther & Li Su & William Marslen-Wilson & Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, 2014. "A Toolbox for Representational Similarity Analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11, April.
    7. Hamed Nili & Alexander Walther & Arjen Alink & Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, 2020. "Inferring exemplar discriminability in brain representations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, June.
    8. Jacob M. Paul & Martijn Ackooij & Tuomas C. Cate & Ben M. Harvey, 2022. "Numerosity tuning in human association cortices and local image contrast representations in early visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Agustin Lage-Castellanos & Giancarlo Valente & Elia Formisano & Federico De Martino, 2019. "Methods for computing the maximum performance of computational models of fMRI responses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, March.
    10. Kay H Brodersen & Thomas M Schofield & Alexander P Leff & Cheng Soon Ong & Ekaterina I Lomakina & Joachim M Buhmann & Klaas E Stephan, 2011. "Generative Embedding for Model-Based Classification of fMRI Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Shinsuke Koyama & Uri Eden & Emery Brown & Robert Kass, 2010. "Bayesian decoding of neural spike trains," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 62(1), pages 37-59, February.
    12. Alessandro T. Gifford & Maya A. Jastrzębowska & Johannes J. D. Singer & Radoslaw M. Cichy, 2025. "In silico discovery of representational relationships across visual cortex," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(10), pages 2079-2098, October.
    13. Kiyohito Iigaya & Sanghyun Yi & Iman A. Wahle & Sandy Tanwisuth & Logan Cross & John P. O’Doherty, 2023. "Neural mechanisms underlying the hierarchical construction of perceived aesthetic value," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Ming Bo Cai & Nicolas W Schuck & Jonathan W Pillow & Yael Niv, 2019. "Representational structure or task structure? Bias in neural representational similarity analysis and a Bayesian method for reducing bias," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-30, May.
    15. Ghislain St-Yves & Emily J. Allen & Yihan Wu & Kendrick Kay & Thomas Naselaris, 2023. "Brain-optimized deep neural network models of human visual areas learn non-hierarchical representations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Hanzhong Liu & Bin Yu, 2017. "Comments on: High-dimensional simultaneous inference with the bootstrap," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(4), pages 740-750, December.
    17. Raheel Zafar & Sarat C Dass & Aamir Saeed Malik, 2017. "Electroencephalogram-based decoding cognitive states using convolutional neural network and likelihood ratio based score fusion," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, May.
    18. Tarana Nigam & Caspar M. Schwiedrzik, 2024. "Predictions enable top-down pattern separation in the macaque face-processing hierarchy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Samy A. Abdel-Ghaffar & Alexander G. Huth & Mark D. Lescroart & Dustin Stansbury & Jack L. Gallant & Sonia J. Bishop, 2024. "Occipital-temporal cortical tuning to semantic and affective features of natural images predicts associated behavioral responses," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Yargholi, E. & Hossein-Zadeh, G.-A., 2019. "Cross recurrence quantifiers as new connectivity measures for structure learning of Bayesian networks in brain decoding," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 263-274.
    21. Jörn Diedrichsen & Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, 2017. "Representational models: A common framework for understanding encoding, pattern-component, and representational-similarity analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-33, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejece0:v:5:y:2021:i:1:id:19265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejece .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.