IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/develo/v2y2022i5id15172.html

Are We Paying More to Consume Substandard Drinking Water? Crowd-Sourced Water Education Study in a South-Asian Megacity

Author

Listed:
  • Arindam Roy

    (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Sandip Sankar Ghosh

    (The Climate Thinker, India)

  • Kosturi Dan

    (Adamas University, India)

  • Gargi Sai

    (Adamas University, India)

  • Sanchaita Maity

    (Adamas University, India)

  • Milan Suryadipto Das

    (Adamas University, India)

  • Debjani Gupta

    (Adamas University, India)

  • Joydeep Paul

    (Adamas University, India)

  • Kuntal Pal

    (Adamas University, India)

  • Subhendu Bandhyopadhay

    (Adamas University, India)

  • Srijan Haldar

    (Adamas University, India)

Abstract

South. Environment and health-related data are inadequate and strongly rely on governmental-mediated observation. The present work is the first of its kind attempt to gather relevant information on potable water quality using mass citizen engagement over a south Asian megacity, Kolkata. The city has a long history associated with water-borne diseases and presently numerous reports on sickness from drinking water contamination have been published in the local newspapers. The current work crowdsourced water sampling throughout the city and analyzed information regarding biological contaminants for five existing water types. 300 citizens were mobilized and trained in water collection through audio-visual communication workshops and together 570 samples of water have been collected from different parts of the city. Water sample collecting points were created over the city and samples were taken to the analysis hub where it was analyzed for standard coliform test and for total dissolved solid (TDS) and pH. The results show that the most expensive water types (20l commercialized packaged drinking water bottles) are the worst in terms of water quality. Governmental-free drinking water was found to be much safer as compared to packaged drinking water. 44% of the packaged drinking water was found to be contaminated with coliform bacteria and we did a comparative analysis with reports from different developing countries and found that such high occurrence was not reported in any cities across the world. We communicated the results to the participants and further, conducted semi-structured interviews to understand the perception of water quality and the driving force behind the choice of a particular water type. It was also found that logistical feasibility is the primary reason behind selecting the 20l bottle. The blind faith in commercially packaged drinking water has been reflected in the interview. The present studies confirm the potential of crowdsourcing of environmental-health data in the global south and successfully accomplish potable water analysis through crowdsource sampling over a south Asian megacity. Such robust methods could be easily scaled up and follow-up discussions can definitely improve water literacy among the participants in Global South.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:epw:develo:v:2:y:2022:i:5:id:15172
DOI: 10.24018/ejdevelop.2022.2.5.172
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdevelop/article/view/15172
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdevelop/article/download/15172/3415
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejdevelop.2022.2.5.172?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:develo:v:2:y:2022:i:5:id:15172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdevelop .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.