Author
Listed:
- Marica Marius-Constantin
(Doctoral School of Electronics, Telecommunications and Information Technology, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest)
- Bostan Ionel
(Department of Electronics, Communications and Computers, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, Pitești University Centre, Pitesti, Romania)
Abstract
This paper addresses a gap in the current literature, namely the absence of a systematic, educationally oriented comparative framework for open-source robotics simulation platforms in the context of Industry 4.0 curricula. While platforms including Gazebo, Webots, and CoppeliaSim are widely used in academic settings, no consolidated study has evaluated them simultaneously against criteria specific to educational environments, such as ease of use, hardware accessibility, pedagogical resource availability, and alignment with ROS 2. Using a multi-criteria evaluation framework applied across four dimensions, specifically ROS 2 integration, ease of use, hardware accessibility, and availability of pedagogical resources, this paper systematically compares Gazebo, Webots, and CoppeliaSim as primary simulation platforms, with contextual references to emerging tools including NVIDIA Isaac Sim and MuJoCo (Multi-Joint dynamics with Contact). The evaluation is grounded in the specific requirements of engineering education programmes targeting Industry 4.0 competencies, where students must acquire practical robotics skills without direct access to industrial hardware. The results indicate that no single platform is optimal across all educational contexts. Webots offers the lowest barrier to entry and is most suitable for introductory courses, while Gazebo, being tightly coupled with ROS 2, is recommended for advanced undergraduate and graduate-level instruction. CoppeliaSim, through its educational license and modular scripting architecture, provides unique advantages for teaching control systems concepts. The paper concludes with a proposed learning pathway for progressive integration of open-source tools across an academic robotics curriculum, along with practical recommendations for laboratory setup and course design.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:enf:proc26:art8:v:17
DOI: 10.63467/alls17.art8
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:enf:proc26:art8:v:17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Preda, Claudia-Andreea (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.