IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/rbfpps/rbf-01-2025-0038.html

Webs of influence: Do institutional networks enhance or distort stock price efficiency?

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Sabeeh Iqbal
  • Zahid Bashir
  • Muhammad Usman
  • Saeed Ahmad Sabir
  • Shrafat Ali Sair

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to investigate the price impact of trading by institutions that differ in their connectedness in a network of financial institutions. Our primary aim is to investigate whether highly connected institutions get an informational advantage over their less-connected counterparts, which ultimately reflects in prices.Design/methodology/approachWe classify institutions into more-connected and less-connected groups by examining the topological structure of the network of financial institutions, such as banks, insurance companies and investment companies. Two institutions are considered connected if they share common shareholdings. Then, the institutions are further classified accordingly using measures such as betweenness centrality, closeness centrality and network strength. Then, we regress stock returns on trading by institutions classified by their network connectedness to find the impact on market efficiency.FindingsWe find that trading by peripheral institutions improves stock price discovery, whereas trading by connected institutions neither harms nor improves the price discovery process. Moreover, we find that trading by peripheral institutions has predictive power for future earnings surprises and abnormal returns around earnings announcements, suggesting a high likelihood of information-based trading.Practical implicationsThis research provides valuable insights to investors and policymakers regarding the price stability that has always remained a significant concern in the financial markets. This will protect the investors’ hard-earned money and suggest appropriate trading strategies to the investors to generate superior risk-adjusted returns.Originality/valueThe study uses a new approach to create a network of financial institutions and challenges the existing claims in the literature that connectedness gives an informational advantage. These results give rise to a new puzzle in the social network literature that overlooks the role of networking as an information blocker. We also uncover a new type of heterogeneity across institutions, i.e. connectedness.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Sabeeh Iqbal & Zahid Bashir & Muhammad Usman & Saeed Ahmad Sabir & Shrafat Ali Sair, 2025. "Webs of influence: Do institutional networks enhance or distort stock price efficiency?," Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(4), pages 684-702, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-01-2025-0038
    DOI: 10.1108/RBF-01-2025-0038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/rbf/article/17/4/684/1255652/Webs-of-influence-Do-institutional-networks
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/rbf/article-pdf/17/4/684/9962150/rbf-01-2025-0038en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/RBF-01-2025-0038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G40 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - General
    • G19 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Other
    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-01-2025-0038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.