Author
Listed:
- Jennifer Tosti-Kharas
- Eric Lamm
- Shoshana R. Dobrow
- Wendy Murphy
- Dawn Chanland
Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to review existing research on the career attitudes, values and behaviors of the Millennial generation (born approximately between 1981 and 1996) to differentiate how research evidence confirms or contradicts the stereotypes of Millennials based on their coverage in the popular press.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted an integrative literature review comprising 102 studies published between 2004 and 2025 that were published in peer-reviewed journals of sufficiently high quality.FindingsThe authors present out findings based on five main themes: career success; career development, patterns and progressions; work-life interface; career-relevant individual differences; and contextual influences on Millennials’ careers, including the global financial crisis of 2008 and the Covid-19 pandemic. What is found largely questions the stereotype of Millennials as being lazy, self-interested job-hoppers. Instead, the authors find that they are committed to work but with a strong sense of work-life balance.Practical implicationsMillennials represent three-quarters of the global workforce in 2025 and are increasingly in leadership positions. Understanding their careers helps others working with them as employees and/or managers. Generational stereotypes have staying power and can contribute to intergenerational conflict; having a perspective based on research evidence provides a more nuanced perspective.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first literature review of research on Millennials that specifically focuses on understanding their careers attitudes, values and behaviors. This study complements existing reviews on Millennials at work.
Suggested Citation
Jennifer Tosti-Kharas & Eric Lamm & Shoshana R. Dobrow & Wendy Murphy & Dawn Chanland, 2026.
"Stereotype or reality? A genuine review of millennials’ career perspectives,"
Organization Management Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(1), pages 97-114, January.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:omjpps:omj-11-2024-2355
DOI: 10.1108/OMJ-11-2024-2355
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:omjpps:omj-11-2024-2355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.