IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/nbripp/v2y2011i2p195-212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploratory analysis about the status quo and differences of organizational innovative climate in China

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Sun
  • Jing Zhao
  • Xu Ya Chen

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the status quo and the strength difference of the climate for innovation among firms with different ownership structures, in different industrial sectors, and in different developmental stages in China. Design/methodology/approach - The study used a survey method to explore the differences of innovative climate among firms with different ownership structures, difference in developmental stage and in different industries. It collected 624 data from 52 companies by purposive and snowball sampling methods. A structural equation model and ANOVA analysis, along with multiple comparisons, were employed to test the hypothesis. Findings - First, by factor analysis and structural equation models, the study proved that the organizational innovative climate model in the Chinese organizational context is a seven dimension structural model, which includes such first‐order factors as working environmental support, innovative vision, leader support, team support, resources supply, learning and growth and knowledge and skills. Second, the results indicate firms in different developmental stages have significant differences in almost all dimensions of climate for innovation. Third, there is no significant difference in innovative climate among firms in different industrial sectors, but further analysis of multiple comparisons shows that there are relative strengths and weaknesses in specific dimensions of innovative climate among such firms. Last, the results suggest that there are significant differences among most dimensions of innovative climate in firms with different ownership structures in China. In assessing employees' experience over seven dimensions of climate, the results demonstrate that respondents vary their answers in the direction of theoretical hypotheses, which validated the relative assumptions. Originality/value - The research is important because it shows that innovative climate strength may discriminate among different work contexts experienced by employees, which would help deepen our understanding of the present condition of innovative climate in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Sun & Jing Zhao & Xu Ya Chen, 2011. "Exploratory analysis about the status quo and differences of organizational innovative climate in China," Nankai Business Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 2(2), pages 195-212, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:nbripp:v:2:y:2011:i:2:p:195-212
    DOI: 10.1108/20408741111139945
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/20408741111139945/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/20408741111139945/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/20408741111139945?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sughra Bibi & Asif Khan & Hongdao Qian & Achille Claudio Garavelli & Angelo Natalicchio & Paolo Capolupo, 2020. "Innovative Climate, a Determinant of Competitiveness and Business Performance in Chinese Law Firms: The Role of Firm Size and Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:nbripp:v:2:y:2011:i:2:p:195-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.