IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/nbripp/nbri-12-2015-0033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does religion matter to dividend policy? Evidence from Buddhism and Taoism in China

Author

Listed:
  • Chunfang Cao
  • Fansheng Jia
  • Xiaowei Zhang
  • Kam C. Chan

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the relation between Buddhism/Taoism and dividend payout decisions among Chinese listed firms during 2003-2013. Design/methodology/approach - The authors include all Chinese A-share listed stocks in their sample during 2003-2013 and use a multiple regression method to conduct their analyses. Findings - Their findings suggest that firms in regions with high influence of Buddhism and Taoism lean toward having high dividend payouts. The results are robust to a battery of alternative specifications in dividend payout, religiosity measures, research methods and dividend regulation regimes. Originality/value - They show that the religions of Buddhism/Taoism play a role in determining dividend payout, complementing other informal institution studies of dividend policy. They complement the literature by providing insights into the impact of Buddhism and Taoism on corporate behaviors beyond immoral or unethical practices. They are able to relate specific doctrinal tenets of Buddhism and Taoism to corporate behavior rather than using only the general moral and ethical guidelines of religiosity.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunfang Cao & Fansheng Jia & Xiaowei Zhang & Kam C. Chan, 2016. "Does religion matter to dividend policy? Evidence from Buddhism and Taoism in China," Nankai Business Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(4), pages 510-541, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:nbripp:nbri-12-2015-0033
    DOI: 10.1108/NBRI-12-2015-0033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/NBRI-12-2015-0033/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/NBRI-12-2015-0033/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/NBRI-12-2015-0033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wen Shi & Xiaogang Bi, 2023. "Buddhism and M&A performance: Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4505-4531, December.
    2. Yanqi Sun, 2024. "Does integrated reporting fit China? A contextual analysis for the innovation of sustainability reporting," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 26313-26344, October.
    3. Dong, Bin & Chen, Yizi & Fan, Cunbin, 2022. "Local corruption and dividend policy: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PB).
    4. Omar Farooq & Mukhammadfoik Bakhadirov & Neveen Ahmed, 2020. "Geographic Variation in Religiosity and Its Impact of Dividend Policies," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 16(1), pages 109-125.
    5. Davaadorj, Zagdbazar, 2019. "Does social capital affect dividend policy?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 116-128.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Religion; Dividend; Behavior;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:nbripp:nbri-12-2015-0033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.