IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/mrrpps/mrr-05-2025-0411.html

Well-being, parity and decent work: a meta-analytic review of psychological capital and employee well-being literature

Author

Listed:
  • Mujtaba Murtuza Momin
  • Krishna Priya Rolla

Abstract

PurposePsychological capital (Psycap) and employee well-being (EWB) have both been identified as constructs within positive psychology; however, there is a lack of detailed investigation that establish their relationship. This study aims to examine how Psycap affects EWB and ascertain the significance they hold for each other in diverse geographical and organizational contexts. This meta-analysis is a step toward accomplishing United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN-SDGs) – 3, 5 and 8.Design/methodology/approachUsing content and meta-analysis, this study combines findings from 5,169 respondents worldwide, published between 2016 and 2025. The comprehensive review analyzes academic literature by identifying key authors, documents, keywords and journals while examining existing literature and patterns.FindingsThe meta-analysis unanimously indicates a significant positive association between Psycap and EWB. The meta-method indicates that this primal association is moderated by gender; wherein the association becomes a little accentuated for women. This goes on to state that the association between Psycap and EWB shall be more meaningful in the case of women participants, though the increase is abysmal. This ascertains that gender is an essential indicator of moderating the Psycap–EWB relationship.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors identify the association between Psycap and EWB to be mitigated by gender; future investigations need to substantiate this with perennial and consistent research Moreover, future aggregation studies may use other databases, such as Google Scholar and EBSCO, to increase the number of relevant articles. Conclusively, they can think of analyzing this association under qualitative parameters, like theoretical frameworks, region, industry and culture.Practical implicationsThe current meta-analysis indicates that firms invest and analyze psycap of an employee, as this may lead to employee happiness, which is theoretically evinced to influence organizational and individual performance. Firms may also try to induct women employees, as the current meta-analysis is indicative of an accentuated feeling of well-being on the inducement of positive psycap. Specifically, the current investigations have broader implications for organizations and policymakers.Social implicationsThe study is in sync with United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN-SDG) 3 (well-being), UN-SDG 5 (gender parity) and UN-SDG 8 (decent work).Originality/valueTo the best of the authors' knowledge, the study is an initial meta-analysis that has triangulated previous research on Psycap and EWB, with major studies coming from the Asian context. Second, the current investigation has incorporated mixed empirical results, based on distinct variable measurements that rationalize the inferences considerably. Finally, this study excavates the relevance of moderating variables that offer significant cues for theory and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Mujtaba Murtuza Momin & Krishna Priya Rolla, 2026. "Well-being, parity and decent work: a meta-analytic review of psychological capital and employee well-being literature," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 49(2), pages 234-252, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:mrr-05-2025-0411
    DOI: 10.1108/MRR-05-2025-0411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/mrr/article/49/2/234/1341050/Well-being-parity-and-decent-work-a-meta-analytic
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/mrr/article-pdf/49/2/234/11231540/mrr-05-2025-0411en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/MRR-05-2025-0411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:mrr-05-2025-0411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.