Author
Listed:
- Ayesha Sengupta
- Vickie Coleman Gallagher
Abstract
PurposeMasculine organizational cultures are perpetuated by stereotypical management practices taught in most business schools. To combat the negative effects of such cultures, how can a spiritual lens inform change management to create a more feminine culture? This study aims to help leaders visualize femininity and appreciate the benefits of spirituality to achieve humanistic workplaces. Change management can be leveraged to alter culture.Design/methodology/approachFirst, the authors highlight feminine management practices showing positive results. Thematic analysis of femininity in the most prevalent traditions of Christianity, Hinduism, Sufism (of the Islamic tradition) and Tibetan Buddhism has great potential to resonate. The themes of femininity in this study illustrate change management signs and symbols to spark a shift in organizational cultures and mental models.FindingsCompassion, connection to nature, unity and a powerful feminine leader (irrespective of gender) are themes discovered in these spiritual traditions.Practical implicationsBased on symbolic interactionism theory, feminine images have the potential to guide and create a more humanistic culture. Human resources and change management practices are levers to facilitate better outcomes. These spiritual workplace practices are then linked to management practices, showing positive outcomes.Social implicationsBecause organizations and societies are interconnected through norms and practices, organizations balanced in their culture and structure have the potential to contribute significantly to society and their community.Originality/valueThe authors explore the intersection of feminine organizational cultures and spiritual wisdom traditions, which can lead to valuable workplace outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Ayesha Sengupta & Vickie Coleman Gallagher, 2025.
"Sparking a feminine organizational culture: insights from spiritual wisdom traditions,"
Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 49(2), pages 173-190, September.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:mrrpps:mrr-04-2024-0287
DOI: 10.1108/MRR-04-2024-0287
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:mrr-04-2024-0287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.