Author
Listed:
- Cornelius J. König
- Manuela Richter
- Isabela Isak
Abstract
Purpose - According to previous research, exit interviews do not fulfil the purpose of generating useful feedback from parting employees. According to signaling theory, they might, however, serve a different purpose: to leave one last good impression on parting employees, and the aim of this study was to test this. Design/methodology/approach - A survey was administered to a sample of 164 German employees. Findings - Consistent with arguments based on signaling theory, those who experienced an exit interview reported more residual affective commitment toward their former employer and less willingness to complain about it, and these effects were mediated by interpersonal fairness perceptions. In addition, the probability of having an exit interview was found to depend on the resignation style of employees. Research limitations/implications - This new perspective on exit interviews can renew the interest in studying how organizations manage the offboarding process. Practical implications - This study advises employers to conduct “exit conversations” (as two-way interactions rather than one-way interviews) and to carefully plan the exit phase. Originality/value - To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that proposes a signaling theory perspective of exit interviews and that links exit interviews with the literature on resignation styles.
Suggested Citation
Cornelius J. König & Manuela Richter & Isabela Isak, 2021.
"Exit interviews as a tool to reduce parting employees’ complaints about their former employer and to ensure residual commitment,"
Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 45(3), pages 381-397, August.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:mrrpps:mrr-02-2021-0148
DOI: 10.1108/MRR-02-2021-0148
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:mrr-02-2021-0148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.