Author
Listed:
- Warren Cook
- Natalie Liberman
- Haidy Brown
Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to examine how observing workplace incivility shapes third parties’ expectations for their own future treatment and their evaluations of the employees, with a focus on perceptions of workplace status for victims.Design/methodology/approachStudy 1 used a scenario-based experiment (n = 320) in which participants observed an interview between two managers that either included or did not include incivility. Participants then evaluated anticipated interpersonal justice, the workplace status of each manager and their preferred affiliation partner. Social dominance orientation was measured in a pre-experiment survey. Study 2 (n = 284) tested whether victim response type (passive, assertive or diplomatic) influenced status attribution and whether belief in a just world moderated the incivility−status relationship.FindingsAcross both studies, victims of incivility were perceived as having lower workplace status. In Study 1, observers also expected less interpersonal fairness for themselves after witnessing incivility. Contrary to predictions, victim response type did not restore perceived status, and neither social dominance orientation nor belief in a just world moderated the incivility–status relationship in the predicted direction.Originality/valueThis research demonstrates that observing workplace incivility leads third parties to infer lower status for victims, highlighting a previously underexamined social consequence of incivility.
Suggested Citation
Warren Cook & Natalie Liberman & Haidy Brown, 2026.
"The status penalty: how witnessing incivility shapes third-party perceptions of victims,"
Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 49(10), pages 1177-1193, September.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:mrrpps:mrr-01-2026-0060
DOI: 10.1108/MRR-01-2026-0060
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mrrpps:mrr-01-2026-0060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.