IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/majpps/maj-07-2017-1601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lead engagement partner workload, partner-client tenure and audit reporting lag

Author

Listed:
  • Wan Nordin Wan Hussin
  • Hasan Mohamad Bamahros
  • Siti Norwahida Shukeri

Abstract

Purpose - Motivated by a recent call fromDeFond and Zhang (2014) for auditing scholars to use “a richer set of audit firm, auditor office, and individual auditor characteristics to capture competency”, this study aims to extend the related line of research by examining the association between lead engagement partner workload, defined as the number of public listed clients the partner is in charge of, and audit lag. The moderating effects of partner tenure on the partner workload–audit lag relationship have also been examined. Design/methodology/approach - The association between auditor workload and financial reporting timeliness on 651 non-financial firms listed on Bursa Malaysia is tested in this study. Data to compute the partner workload are based on 222 lead engagement partners who signed off the audit reports for all 892 public listed firms in 2013. Findings - The busy auditors are observed to prolong audit lags, and the effect is more acute for non-Big 4 clients, busy season clients and a short partner tenure. The engagement partners with heavy workload can also mitigate the adverse effects of reduced audit report timeliness when they have a longer partner–client tenure. Research limitations/implications - This study may understate the level of engagement partner workload when partners have private firms in their client portfolios. Notwithstanding that, this study reiterates the growing importance of examining accounting and auditing outcomes at the individual partner level. Practical implications - The findings that over-burdened engagement partner takes a longer time to complete the audit add to the current debate, where audit regulators and various stakeholders are actively promoting discussions on potential indicators of audit efficiency and quality. Originality/value - This study provides new evidence on the association between partner workload and audit reporting lag, which has hitherto been unexplored. This study also extends the research carried out byGulet al.(2017) andSharmaet al.(2017) by providing additional evidence on the relationship between partner tenure and audit delay.

Suggested Citation

  • Wan Nordin Wan Hussin & Hasan Mohamad Bamahros & Siti Norwahida Shukeri, 2018. "Lead engagement partner workload, partner-client tenure and audit reporting lag," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(3), pages 246-266, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:maj-07-2017-1601
    DOI: 10.1108/MAJ-07-2017-1601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MAJ-07-2017-1601/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MAJ-07-2017-1601/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/MAJ-07-2017-1601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Singh, Harjinder & Sultana, Nigar & Islam, Ariful & Singh, Abhijeet, 2022. "Busy auditors, financial reporting timeliness and quality," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(3).
    2. Husaini, 2019. "The Substitution Role of Audit Committee Effectiveness and Audit Quality in Explaining Audit Report Lag," GATR Journals afr171, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    3. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:152-169 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:450-461 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Wan-Hussin, Wan Nordin & Fitri, Hadiati & Salim, Basariah, 2021. "Audit committee chair overlap, chair expertise, and internal auditing practices: Evidence from Malaysia," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    6. Toni Šušak, 2020. "The effect of regulatory changes on relationship between earnings management and financial reporting timeliness: The case of COVID-19 pandemic," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 38(2), pages 453-473.
    7. Ayad Ahmed Mohammed Al-Qublani & Hasnah Kamardin & Rohami Shafie, 2020. "Audit Committee Chair Attributes and Audit Report Lag in an Emerging Market," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(4), pages 475-492, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Malaysia; Audit delay; Busy auditor; Engagement partner workload; Partner tenure; Audit reporting lag; M4;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:maj-07-2017-1601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.