IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/majpps/02686900610634748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are the audit committee reports disclosing enough after the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act?

Author

Listed:
  • Ganesh M. Pandit
  • Vijaya Subrahmanyam
  • Grace M. Conway

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of the current study is to examine audit committee reports of a sample of companies listed on the NYSE to determine the extent to which these reports contain voluntary disclosures that would indicate compliance with the relevant requirements of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act (SOX) and the rules imposed by the SEC and NYSE. Design/methodology/approach - Reviewed the contents of the audit committee reports from the 2004 proxy statements of a random sample of one hundred companies from those listed on the NYSE. These companies were drawn from a variety of industries and represented a wide cross‐section of the total market. The content of audit committee reports was examined to see if the committees voluntarily disclosed, within the body of the report, compliance with the requirements of SOX. Findings - The results reveal that there is a significant diversity in the form and content of the audit committee reports published in the sample. It appears that while some audit committees treat their report as more than just a regulatory requirement and provide more voluntary disclosure, many others continue to provide only the minimum required information in their report. Research limitations/implications - The study focused on the actual body of the audit committee reports to examine disclosures about the compliance with SOX. It is likely that in many cases, the disclosures that did not appear within the audit committee reports may appear elsewhere in the proxy statement. Also, the study only examined audit committee reports of a sample of NYSE companies. Future research might include audit committee reports of those companies in the NASDAQ system. Practical implications - Readers of audit committee reports might view more favorably the performance of those audit committees whose reports contain more extensive disclosures of the compliance with the SOX requirements. Originality/value - This paper fulfills a need to know if audit committees are meeting the requirement of SOX and disclosing it. It warns readers that in order to obtain complete information as to the functioning of audit committees, they might need to conduct a complete search of the proxy statements and not only the section relating to the audit committee report.

Suggested Citation

  • Ganesh M. Pandit & Vijaya Subrahmanyam & Grace M. Conway, 2006. "Are the audit committee reports disclosing enough after the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act?," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(1), pages 34-45, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:02686900610634748
    DOI: 10.1108/02686900610634748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02686900610634748/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02686900610634748/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/02686900610634748?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:02686900610634748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.