IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v66y2026i2p1455-1479.html

Regulatory Pressure and Audit Resource Reallocation: Evidence From Mandatory Audit Committee Report Disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Jiawei Wang
  • Yonghai Wang

Abstract

This study examines how regulatory pressure affects audit firms' internal resource allocation. Leveraging the mandate requiring Shanghai‐listed firms to disclose standalone audit committee reports, we employ a difference‐in‐differences design to identify causal effects. Audit report lags (ARLs) increase for treated firms, suggesting heightened audit scrutiny, whereas untreated firms—especially non‐key clients—experience a temporary reduction in ARLs, consistent with resource diversion under capacity constraints. At the audit firm level, the policy widens ARL gaps between treated and control clients, providing evidence of cross‐client resource reallocation. These findings show that disclosure‐based governance regulation can enhance audit effort for targeted firms but also create negative spillovers for lower‐priority clients.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiawei Wang & Yonghai Wang, 2026. "Regulatory Pressure and Audit Resource Reallocation: Evidence From Mandatory Audit Committee Report Disclosure," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 66(2), pages 1455-1479, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:2:p:1455-1479
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.70189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70189
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/acfi.70189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:2:p:1455-1479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.