IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jfrcpp/v21y2013i2p188-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta‐regulation of OTC derivatives contracts post reform

Author

Listed:
  • Siona Listokin‐Smith

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the probable structure of bilateral derivatives contracts following international regulatory reforms. Design/methodology/approach - The theoretical context of the paper is private and meta‐regulation, which the author applies to a case study and current industry analysis. Findings - While regulations are still being written, it is likely that elements of oversight for the bilateral derivatives market will involve enforced self‐regulation. When combined with more specific outcome‐oriented regulatory requirements, the industry is well‐suited to this type of coordinated regulatory regime. Practical implications - In light of the uncertainty of derivatives regulation and the future size of the bilateral, over‐the‐counter (OTC) derivatives market, practitioners should consider a likely broader range of regulation structures. Originality/value - The paper fills a gap in the literature about non‐traditional governance structures for the derivatives markets following the financial crisis. Rather than considering regulation on a light/heavy axis, the paper examines whether this segment of the market can sustain a process‐oriented regulatory arrangement.

Suggested Citation

  • Siona Listokin‐Smith, 2013. "Meta‐regulation of OTC derivatives contracts post reform," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(2), pages 188-200, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:v:21:y:2013:i:2:p:188-200
    DOI: 10.1108/13581981311315677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13581981311315677/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13581981311315677/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/13581981311315677?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brooke Lahneman, 2018. "“Meta regulation in practice: Beyond normative views of morality and rationality” by F.C. Simon (Routledge, 2017)," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(1), pages 213-218, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:v:21:y:2013:i:2:p:188-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.