IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jfrcpp/v16y2008i1p59-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulation and information asymmetry

Author

Listed:
  • Robyn McLaughlin
  • Assem Safieddine

Abstract

Purpose - This paper seeks to examine the potential for regulation to reduce information asymmetries between firm insiders and outside investors. Design/methodology/approach - Extensive prior research has established that there are substantial effects of information asymmetry in seasoned equity offers (SEOs). The paper tests for a mitigating effect of regulation on such information asymmetries by examining differences in long‐run operating performance, changes in that performance, and announcement‐period stock returns between unregulated industrial firms and regulated utilities that issue seasoned equity. The authors also segment the samples by firm size, since smaller firms are likely to have greater asymmetries. Findings - Consistent with regulated utility firms having lower levels of information asymmetry, they have superior changes in abnormal operating performance than industrial firms pre‐ to post‐issue and their announcement period returns are significantly less negative. These findings are most pronounced for the smallest firms, firms likely to have the greatest information asymmetries and where regulation could have its greatest effect. Research limitations/implications - The paper does not examine costs of regulation. Thus, future research could seek to measure the cost/benefit trade‐off of regulation in reducing information asymmetry. Also, future research could examine cross‐sectional differences between different industries and regulated utilities. Practical implications - Regulation reduces information asymmetry. Thus, regulation or mandated disclosure may be appropriate in industries/markets where information asymmetry is severe. Originality/value - This paper is the first to compare the operating performance of regulated and unregulated SEO firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Robyn McLaughlin & Assem Safieddine, 2008. "Regulation and information asymmetry," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(1), pages 59-76, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:v:16:y:2008:i:1:p:59-76
    DOI: 10.1108/13581980810853217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13581980810853217/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13581980810853217/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/13581980810853217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoming He & Lin Cui & Klaus E. Meyer, 2022. "How state and market logics influence firm strategy from within and outside? Evidence from Chinese financial intermediary firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 587-614, June.
    2. Aima Khan & Muhammad Azeem Qureshi & Pål Ingebrigt Davidsen, 2020. "How do oil prices and investments impact the dynamics of firm value?," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 74-100, January.
    3. Minhua Yang, 2022. "Financial innovation regulations and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 24-41, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:v:16:y:2008:i:1:p:59-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.