IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jfrapp/v8y2010i1p35-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voluntary disclosure byShariahapproved companies: an exploratory study

Author

Listed:
  • A.A. Ousama
  • A.H. Fatima

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the extent of voluntary disclosure (EVD) (i.e. overall, conventional, and Islamic disclosure) in the annual reports ofShariahApproved Companies (ShAC) listed on Bursa Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach - A disclosure index was developed, which consists of 59 items (including items related to theShariah, i.e. Islamic items), to measure the EVD in the annual reports ofShAC. Secondary data from annual reports were analyzed using descriptive statistics andt‐test. Findings - ShAC disclosed on average 19, 21 and 17 percent of overall, conventional, and Islamic items, respectively. The EVD of conventional items is comparable to prior studies, and higher than Islamic items. Research limitations/implications - The paper only used one‐year annual reports for the year 2003, but it provides a starting point for future research on the issue of voluntary disclosure byShAC. Practical implications - The findings provide evidence thatShAC still lack voluntary disclosure, especially, Islamic disclosure items. Such findings could be useful to regulation authorities in Malaysia for the improvement of overall disclosure practices byShAC. Originality/value - The paper is the first empirical study to investigate the EVD, both Islamic and conventional, in the annual reports ofShAC.

Suggested Citation

  • A.A. Ousama & A.H. Fatima, 2010. "Voluntary disclosure byShariahapproved companies: an exploratory study," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(1), pages 35-49, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jfrapp:v:8:y:2010:i:1:p:35-49
    DOI: 10.1108/19852511011055943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/19852511011055943/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/19852511011055943/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/19852511011055943?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehdi Khodakarami & Hassan Yazdifar & Alireza Faraji Khaledi & Saeed Bagheri Kheirabadi & Amin Sarlak, 2024. "The Level of Islamic Religiosity of the Local Community and Corporate Environmental Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from Iran," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(2), pages 483-512, March.
    2. Abdullah Muhammad Ahmed Ayedh & Muhammad Iqmal Hisham Kamaruddin & Amir Shaharuddin, 2019. "Challenging the Current Shariah Screening Methodology Assessments in Kuala Lumpur Shariah Index (KLSI)," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 9(4), pages 253-268, October.
    3. Amin Jan & Maran Marimuthu & Muhammad Pisol bin @Mat Isa & Pia A. Albinsson, 2021. "Sustainability Practices and Banks Financial Performance: A Conceptual Review from the Islamic Banking Industry in Malaysia," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(11), pages 1-61, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfrapp:v:8:y:2010:i:1:p:35-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.