IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijppmp/v64y2015i1p94-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key observations from a survey about Six Sigma implementation in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Abel Ribeiro de Jesus
  • Jiju Antony
  • Herman Augusto Lepikson
  • Carlos Arthur M. Teixeira Cavalcante

Abstract

Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to present a survey on Six Sigma and key observations on which variables/management practices are the most important for a successful Six Sigma implementation, as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the practices observed in companies in Brazil. Design/methodology/approach - – Five research questions were proposed, and an exploratory field study was carried out. A sample of 103 questionnaires was obtained. In total, 26 independent variables were analyzed, with a factor analysis reducing this number to 14, for which three main constructs were observed. Findings - – Large manufacturing industries are implementing the Six Sigma program in Brazil. Three main constructs were observed to be critical for the success of Six Sigma. The strengths and weaknesses of the 14 independent variables studied within each construct were found. Practical implications - – This paper has practical implications in that companies can use the conclusions of this study to improve their implementation of the Six Sigma program. Social implications - – This research may initiate cooperation between the companies within the study and academia, which may lead to a better understanding of Six Sigma within these organizations. Originality/value - – The originality of this study is that the survey was conducted with companies in Brazil, a country that suffers from a lack of information on Six Sigma programs. A robust methodological strategy was used that determined the three most important constructs for successful implementation of Six Sigma.

Suggested Citation

  • Abel Ribeiro de Jesus & Jiju Antony & Herman Augusto Lepikson & Carlos Arthur M. Teixeira Cavalcante, 2015. "Key observations from a survey about Six Sigma implementation in Brazil," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 64(1), pages 94-111, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:v:64:y:2015:i:1:p:94-111
    DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-06-2013-0109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2013-0109/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2013-0109/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2013-0109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Neeraj Yadav & Ravi Shankar & Surya Prakash Singh, 2022. "Cognitive aspects of Lean Six Sigma," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 607-666, April.
    2. Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & Giner Alor-Hernández & Cuauhtémoc Sánchez-Ramírez & Emilio Jiménez-Macías & Julio Blanco-Fernández & Juan I. Latorre-Biel, 2018. "Mediating Role of the Six Sigma Implementation Strategy and Investment in Human Resources in Economic Success and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Jorge L. García-Alcaraz & Liliana Avelar-Sosa & Juan I. Latorre-Biel & Emilio Jiménez-Macías & Giner Alor-Hernández, 2017. "Role of Human Knowledge and Communication on Operational Benefits Gained from Six Sigma," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:v:64:y:2015:i:1:p:94-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.