IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijppmp/v59y2010i7p641-667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework for designing, managing, and improving Kaizen event programs

Author

Listed:
  • Eileen M. Van Aken
  • Jennifer A. Farris
  • Wiljeana J. Glover
  • Geert Letens

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to introduce a framework for the design and management of a Kaizen event program where short‐term improvement projects (Kaizen events) are systematically used to introduce rapid change in targeted work areas, often relying on lean work system principles. Design/methodology/approach - To develop the framework and the assessment approach, a comprehensive literature review and a field study of Kaizen event programs in three organizations were conducted. To illustrate the potential usefulness of the framework and the assessment approach, this paper presents a case study of how the framework was applied to design and improve a Kaizen event program in the Belgian Armed Forces. Findings - Use of the framework as a design and assessment tool appeared to make the Kaizen event program more effective in the case study organization. Specific areas of improvement identified included: clearly defining event goals, scheduling extended follow‐up activities, defining measures to track results, assigning roles for Kaizen event evaluation activities, and sharing lessons learned in areas of the organization outside the work processes targeted by Kaizen events. Originality/value - With the increased use of lean work system practices in recent years, many organizations are using Kaizen events to rapidly introduce change and to create a culture of continual improvement (or kaizen). However, organizations lack systematic, research‐based guidance on how to best design and implement Kaizen event improvement programs and how to best assess results. The proposed framework attempts to address these gaps.

Suggested Citation

  • Eileen M. Van Aken & Jennifer A. Farris & Wiljeana J. Glover & Geert Letens, 2010. "A framework for designing, managing, and improving Kaizen event programs," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 59(7), pages 641-667, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:v:59:y:2010:i:7:p:641-667
    DOI: 10.1108/17410401011075648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17410401011075648/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17410401011075648/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/17410401011075648?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Costa, Federica & Lispi, Leonardo & Staudacher, Alberto Portioli & Rossini, Matteo & Kundu, Kaustav & Cifone, Fabiana Dafne, 2019. "How to foster Sustainable Continuous Improvement: A cause-effect relations map of Lean soft practices," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    2. Janine Sanders Jones & John R. Olson & Peter Southard, 2021. "Kaizen Events at the University of St. Thomas: Experiential Learning for Students," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 115-129, September.
    3. Huay Ling Tay & Prakash J. Singh & Vikram Bhakoo & Shahid Al-Balushi, 2017. "Contextual factors: assessing their influence on flow or resource efficiency orientations in healthcare lean projects," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 118-136, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:v:59:y:2010:i:7:p:641-667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.