IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijmpps/01437720610683958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The market reaction to layoff announcements: a union‐nonunion comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Steven E. Abraham

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to compare the market reaction to layoff announcements of union and nonunion employees. Design/methodology/approach - Event study methodology was utilized to assess the effects of layoff announcements of union versus nonunion employees. The union status of the laid‐off employees was determined for 135 layoff announcements reported in theWall Street Journalin 1993 and 1994 and shareholder returns between the two groups was compared. Findings - Over each event period tested, the market reaction was more negative when nonunion employees were downsized than when the announcement concerned unionized employees. Over the two days surrounding the announcement, the market reaction to the layoff announcement of unionized employees was actually positive, while the reaction was negative when nonunion employees were the subject of the announcement. Research limitations/implications - The sample included layoff announcements from 1993 and 1994 only. The market reaction to announcements in different years might be different. Originality/value - While many papers have examined the market reaction to layoff announcements, this is the first paper that compares the reaction to union versus nonunion employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven E. Abraham, 2006. "The market reaction to layoff announcements: a union‐nonunion comparison," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(5), pages 452-466, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijmpps:01437720610683958
    DOI: 10.1108/01437720610683958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01437720610683958/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01437720610683958/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/01437720610683958?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijmpps:01437720610683958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.