Author
Listed:
- Joseph Deutsch
- Jacques Silber
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to introduce a normative approach to the measurement of segregation in the labor force, thus ascertaining whether segregation is due mainly to the existence of very “male‐intensive” occupations or to the presence of very “female‐intensive” occupations. Design/methodology/approach - This paper is an empirical illustration, based on data for ten European countries during the last decade of the twentieth century. Findings - Confirms the usefulness of this new approach to the study of segregation by gender. Shows in particular that one has to be very careful in drawing conclusions since the results depend in part on whether the population analyzed is that of self‐employed, employees, employees working full time or employees working part time. Research limitations/implications - This new normative approach to the study of segregation by gender gives much more flexibility to the policy makers whose aim is to reduce occupational segregation by gender because it gives enough information to give them the possibility to focus the attention on specific segments of the labor force. However, the results were often quite sensitive to the choice of the value taken by a parameter that characterizes this normative approach. Practical implications - This new approach extends the way segregation by gender in the labor force is apprehended. Originality/value - The normative segregation index derived in this paper has never been used previously.
Suggested Citation
Joseph Deutsch & Jacques Silber, 2005.
"Comparing segregation by gender in the labor force across ten European countries in the 1990s,"
International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(3), pages 237-264, April.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:ijmpps:01437720510604947
DOI: 10.1108/01437720510604947
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijmpps:01437720510604947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.