IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekz/ekonoz/2025109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural Policy Evaluation: Benchmarking Stakeholders’ Preferences Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process Technique

Author

Listed:
  • María José del Barrio Tellado

    (Universidad de Valladolid)

  • Fátima Espinosa Casero

    (Universidad de Valladolid)

  • Jonathan Daniel Gómez Zapata

    (Universidad de Valladolid / Universidad Nacional de Colombia)

  • Luis César Herrero-Prieto

    (Universidad de Valladolid)

Abstract

Participatory management models of cultural institutions are gaining increasing interest but have so far been subject to little evaluation. The aim of this paper is to estimate the value allocated to the participatory policies of a sample of museums from the institutional perspective (managers and stakeholders) through benchmarking dimensions and options proposed in the cultural strategy. We apply the analytic hierarchy process method, which allows us to obtain a robust hierarchical ranking of alternatives according to stakeholder preference intensity. Results show a priority for social and technological innovation strategies and less interest in co-governance actions. This research represents a proposal for an efficient evaluation of cultural policies and the performance of cultural institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • María José del Barrio Tellado & Fátima Espinosa Casero & Jonathan Daniel Gómez Zapata & Luis César Herrero-Prieto, 2025. "Cultural Policy Evaluation: Benchmarking Stakeholders’ Preferences Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process Technique," EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, Gobierno Vasco / Eusko Jaurlaritza / Basque Government, vol. 107(01), pages 198-229.
    • Handle: RePEc:ekz:ekonoz:2025109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.euskadi.eus/web01-a2reveko/es/k86aEkonomiazWar/ekonomiaz/abrirArticulo?idpubl=104®istro=12
    File Function: complete text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • H44 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekz:ekonoz:2025109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iñaki Treviño (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/debages.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.