IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekm/repojs/v28y2008i1p155-165id519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Answers to a marxist critic of the rhetorical and pragmatic perspectives in economics

Author

Listed:
  • Danilo Araújo Fernandes
  • Paulo Gala
  • José Marcio Rego

Abstract

Based on recent discussions regarding the rhetorical perspective in economics, this paper presents an interpretation of the philosophical approach of Habermas which attempts to rescue the so called ´modern spirit´, forgotten in the annals of the 19th century, similar to that presented by Marshall Berman in 1982. Following the reconstructive approach of Habermas´s project of modernity, we attempt to show how a ´rhetorical approach´ could be applied in the field of economics, and yet still be clearly modern by taking into account intersubjectivities, given the expanded sphere of human communication (as defended in the theory of communicative action of Habermas). In this sense, we will seek to demonstrate the philosophical limits of the anti-rhetorical critiques of, for example, Paulani (1996, 2003, 2005, 2006), which seem to underestimate the linguistic and intersubjective aspect of Habermas´s philosophical project that can also be found in McCloskey’s methodological approach. JEL Classification: B41.

Suggested Citation

  • Danilo Araújo Fernandes & Paulo Gala & José Marcio Rego, 2008. "Answers to a marxist critic of the rhetorical and pragmatic perspectives in economics," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 28(1), pages 155-165.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:28:y:2008:i:1:p:155-165:id:519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/519/517
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Rhetoric project; modernity; linguistic turn and intersubjectivity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:28:y:2008:i:1:p:155-165:id:519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (Brazil) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org/repojs/index.php/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.