IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekm/repojs/v16y1996i2p274-292id1205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demonstrate the rational order of the market: reflections on an impossible project

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Ganem

Abstract

The Walrasian approach in the neoclassical theory aims to explain a generaland stable equilibrium over time which is determined by the maximizing behaviour ofagents in the marketplace. This paper intends to highlight the main logical shortcomingsinherent to the General Equilibrium Theory, which have important implications at theresearch level. In this context, the main issues become: i) at the level of assumptions, theissue of stability introduces a fundamental indetermination in the model; ii) the well-knownmarket imperfections in the real world contribute to the impossibility of setting generalprinciples. The search to address the issues through a more realistic approach generates newindeterminations and makes it even more difficult to attain the Pareto Optimum. In orderto better understand the logical and methodological impossibilities of this theory, the article suggests referring the research program to the rational constructivist philosophy of modemtimes. JEL Classification: B20; B41.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Ganem, 1996. "Demonstrate the rational order of the market: reflections on an impossible project," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 16(2), pages 274-292.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:16:y:1996:i:2:p:274-292:id:1205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/1205/1190
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic methodology; history of economic thought; general equilibrium;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B20 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - General
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:16:y:1996:i:2:p:274-292:id:1205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (Brazil) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org/repojs/index.php/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.