IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejw/journl/v13y2016i2p324-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer Review and the Development of the Impartial Spectator

Author

Listed:
  • Craig Smith

Abstract

The impartial spectator is one of the central concepts of Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments. This paper examines the origins of the impartial spectator in Smith’s response to a criticism leveled by certain of his peers at the first edition of TMS. It argues that many of the key aspects and functions of the impartial spectator can best be understood as Smith’s attempt to deal with Gilbert Elliot’s charge that his theory collapses into moral conventionalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Craig Smith, 2016. "Peer Review and the Development of the Impartial Spectator," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 13(2), pages 324–329-3, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:13:y:2016:i:2:p:324-329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/File+download/917/SmithCMay2016.pdf?mimetype=pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/1024
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ötsch, Walter, 2016. "Imaginative Grundlagen bei Adam Smith: Aspekte von Bildlichkeit und ihrem Verlust in der Geschichte der Ökonomie," Working Paper Series Ök-19, Cusanus Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung, Institut für Ökonomie.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Adam Smith; Theory of Moral Sentiments; impartial spectator; philosophy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:13:y:2016:i:2:p:324-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jason Briggeman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edgmuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.