IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejw/journl/v13y2016i2p273-283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adam Smith’s Impartial Spectator: Symposium Remarks

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Fleischacker

Abstract

I argue that Adam Smith’s impartial spectator should be regarded as an eminently human figure, not an ideal beyond ordinary people’s reach, let alone an emblem of the divine. This reading makes best sense of how the figure functions in The Theory of Moral Sentiments, enables Smith to construct a plausible version of moral sentimentalism, and gives him a response to a problem he saw in David Hume’s sentimentalism. The reading also makes it somewhat difficult for Smith to give a satisfying response to the dangers of cultural relativism, but that problem, I argue, his system shares with most other moral philosophies.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Fleischacker, 2016. "Adam Smith’s Impartial Spectator: Symposium Remarks," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 13(2), pages 273–283-2, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:13:y:2016:i:2:p:273-283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/File+download/923/FleischackerMay2016.pdf?mimetype=pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/1030
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Adam Smith; Theory of Moral Sentiments; impartial spectator; philosophy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:13:y:2016:i:2:p:273-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jason Briggeman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edgmuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.