IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejn/ejssjr/v5y2017i4p23-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China’S Role And Status In International Society: Should Its Rise Be Perceived As A ‘Threat’?

Author

Listed:
  • Dahlia Patricia Sterling

    (Shandong University, China)

Abstract

China has been making strides in numerous areas the entire world is still trying to grapple with and determine in what way China’s economic growth, active engagement and participation in the world system will affect nation states. Without a doubt, this has added increasing pressure and brought complications for China in continuously explaining its economic growth to a number of actors who perceive its growth and active participation in international society as a “threat”. In effect, China is still yet to define completely its new role in international society even today, and is still using its foreign policy principles and approaches in its participatory role in international society. Moreover, despite honoring its commitments to international society, it still plays a comparatively lesser role in the shaping and making of rules and regulations. Thus, rather than developing and creating new comprehensive policies geared towards shaping and making new rules and regulations to guide its action and roles in international society given that numerous changes have occurred in the world, such as more and more civil conflicts, humanitarian crisis and rogue leaders on the rise today, etc.; China needs to make changes to ensure that not only its voice is heard, but its rules and regulations are up-to-date, works and applicable along with its spoken voice. Based on these assumptions and debates, it is therefore reasonable to make an attempt to determine China’s role and status in its involvement in international society and its rise to become a global power, given its participation in international society which plays a significant part in the way the world perceives China’s rise. On this basis, the article intends to attempt to unravel China’s role and status in international society, the limitations and challenges China faces and the perception of its threat in becoming a “rising” global power.

Suggested Citation

  • Dahlia Patricia Sterling, 2017. "China’S Role And Status In International Society: Should Its Rise Be Perceived As A ‘Threat’?," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 5(4), pages 23-33.
  • Handle: RePEc:ejn:ejssjr:v:5:y:2017:i:4:p:23-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/EJSS-5.4.-4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buzan, Barry, 1993. "From international system to international society: structural realism and regime theory meet the English school," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(3), pages 327-352, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iwona Pawlas, 2017. "The Evaluation Of Polish-Slovak Trade Relations Between 2010 And 2015," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 15(2), pages 163-181.
    2. Shakthi De Silva, 2015. "Balancing, Bandwagoning or Hedging? Independent Ceylon’s Reaction to Regional Hegemony," South Asian Survey, , vol. 22(2), pages 189-209, September.
    3. Ecker, Matthias, 1999. "Political boundary making toward Poland: Social identities and interest-formation in German elite reasoning," Discussion Papers, Research Group International Politics P 99-307, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. Ali Onur TEPECIKLIOGLU, 2016. "An Analysis of the World Society Conceptualization in the English School," Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 16(4), pages 733-743.
    5. Jaroslava Jebavá, 2017. "Factors Explaining Engagement Of Non-Governmental Organisations In The Un," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 15(2), pages 121-153.
    6. Stanislav Mráz, 2017. "State Sovereignty And Humanitarian Intervention," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 15(2), pages 154-162.
    7. Karol R. Sorby, 2017. "MENDEL, MILOŠ: DĚJINY SAÚDSKÉ ARÁBIE, Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny, 2016, 400 s. ISBN 978-80-7422-499-7," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 15(2), pages 208-210.
    8. Devika Sharma, 2014. "Turning the Outside In," South Asian Survey, , vol. 21(1-2), pages 260-277, March.
    9. Katharina McLarren, 2023. "Religion as ‘Prime Institution’ of International Society," International Studies, , vol. 60(1), pages 7-28, January.
    10. Chris Brown, 2009. "The Development of International Relations Theory in the United Kingdom," International Studies, , vol. 46(1-2), pages 221-237, January.
    11. Elizabeth M. Moore & Kristin Brandl & Luis Alfonso Dau, 2023. "Intergovernmental organizations, institutional schisms, and business environments," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(2), pages 141-158, June.
    12. Boyka M. Stefanova & Paskal Zhelev, 2022. "Testing the Premises of International Society in the European Energy Union: The Pluralism/Solidarism Nexus," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1255-1271, September.
    13. Mayntz, Renate, 2000. "Politikwissenschaft in einer entgrenzten Welt," MPIfG Discussion Paper 00/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    14. Martina Ponížilová, 2017. "Stability Of Regional Orders In Contemporary International System: A Framework For Analysis," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 15(2), pages 182-207.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejn:ejssjr:v:5:y:2017:i:4:p:23-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Esra Barakli (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.