IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ege/journl/v12y2012i2p239-249.html

Yoneticilerin Kulturel Degerleri ve Izleyici Davranisi Tercihleri

Author

Listed:
  • Mert AKTAS

    (Toros Universitesi, Iktisadi Idari ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakultesi, Isletme Bolumu)

  • Abdullah CAN

    (Cag Universitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu)

Abstract

Bu arastirmanin amaci yoneticilerin kulturel degerleri ve tercih ettikleri izleyicilik tipi arasindaki iliski incelemektir. Arastirmada bireycilik, guc mesafesi, belirsizlikten kacinma, eril degerler ve babacan davranis beklentisi (paternalizm) kulturel deger cercevesi olarak ele alinmistir. Izleyici davranislarinda ise Kelley’nin ortaya koydugu iki boyutlu izleyicilik modeli kullanilmistir. Boyutlar bagimsiz ve elestirel dusunme ve aktif katilimdir. Arastirmada eril ve bireyci degerler acisindan yuksek olan yoneticilerin astlarinin daha fazla bagimsiz ve elestirel dusunmesini isteyecekleri, fakat bellisizlikten kacinma, guc mesafesi ve babacan davranis beklentisi yuksek yoneticiler acisindan ise tam tersi olacagi tartisilmistir. Yine, yoneticilerin eril ve bireyci degerleri arttikca astlarindan aktif ve kendi kendine hareket edebilir olmasi beklentisinin artacagi fakat belirsizlikten kacinma, guc mesafesi ve babacan davranis beklentisi degerleri arttikca yoneticiler astlarinin aktif ve kendi kendine hareket edebilir olmasini istememeyecekleri tartisilmistir. Arastirmada 316 yoneticiden veri toplanmistir. Arastirmada bireycilik acisindan yuksek olan yoneticilerin astlarinin daha fazla bagimsiz ve elestirel dusunmesini istemekte oldugu, guc mesafesi ve babacan davranis beklentisi yuksek yoneticilerin ise astlarindan bagimsiz ve elestirel olarak dusunmesini istememekte olduklari, yine, yoneticilerin bireyci degerleri arttikca astlarindan aktif ve kendi kendine hareket edebilir olmasini istedikleri fakat belirsizlikten kacinma ve babacan davranis beklentisi degerleri arttikca yoneticiler astlarinin aktif ve kendi kendine hareket edebilir olmasini istememekte olduklari ortaya cikmistir.

Suggested Citation

  • Mert AKTAS & Abdullah CAN, 2012. "Yoneticilerin Kulturel Degerleri ve Izleyici Davranisi Tercihleri," Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 239-249.
    • Handle: RePEc:ege:journl:v:12:y:2012:i:2:p:239-249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.onlinedergi.com/makaledosyalari/51/pdf2012_2_10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.onlinedergi.com/eab/arsiv/arsivDetay.aspx?yil=2012&peryot=2
    File Function: Website of the journal issue
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McGrath, Rita Gunther & MacMillan, Ian C. & Scheinberg, Sari, 1992. "Elitists, risk-takers, and rugged individualists? An exploratory analysis of cultural differences between entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 115-135, March.
    2. L. Wade, 1988. "Review," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 99-100, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esa Mangeloja, 2004. "Interrelationship of economic growth and regional religious properties," ERSA conference papers ersa04p94, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Kaplow, Louis & Shapiro, Carl, 2007. "Antitrust," Handbook of Law and Economics, in: A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell (ed.), Handbook of Law and Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 1073-1225, Elsevier.
    3. Giuseppe Croce & Emanuela Ghignoni, 2011. "Overeducation and spatial flexibility in Italian local labour markets," Working Papers in Public Economics 145, Department of Economics and Law, Sapienza University of Rome.
    4. Minguzzi, Antonio & Passaro, Renato, 2001. "The network of relationships between the economic environment and the entrepreneurial culture in small firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 181-207, March.
    5. David M. Brasington & Diane Hite, 2005. "Demand for Environmental Quality: A Spatial Hedonic Approach," Departmental Working Papers 2005-08, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
    6. Juan Carlos Conesa & Timothy J. Kehoe & Kim J. Ruhl, 2007. "Modeling great depressions: the depression in Finland in the 1990s," Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, vol. 31(Nov), pages 16-44.
    7. Élodie Bertrand, 2006. "La thèse d'efficience du « théorème de Coase ». Quelle critique de la microéconomie ?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 57(5), pages 983-1007.
    8. Yves Alarie & Georges Dionne, 2005. "Testing explanations of preference reversal: A model," Working Papers 05-2, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
    9. Duclos, Jean-Yves & Sahn, David & Younger, Stephen D., 2003. "Polarization: Robust Multidimensional Poverty Comparisons," Cahiers de recherche 0304, CIRPEE.
    10. Alexander S. Sangare, 2005. "Efficience des marchés : un siècle après Bachelier," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 81(4), pages 107-132.
    11. Averous, J. & Fougères, A. -L. & Meste, M., 1996. "Tailweight with respect to the mode for unimodal distributions," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 367-373, August.
    12. Henda Omri & Anis Omri & Abdessalem Abbassi, 2024. "Macro-level determinants of entrepreneurial behavior and motivation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2629-2667, December.
    13. W. Crain & Robert Tollison, 2002. "Consumer Choice and the Popular Music Industry: A Test of the Superstar Theory," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 1-9, March.
    14. Brock, William A. & Hommes, Cars H. & Wagener, Florian O. O., 2005. "Evolutionary dynamics in markets with many trader types," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1-2), pages 7-42, February.
    15. Basu, Susanto & Fernald, John G. & Shapiro, Matthew D., 2001. "Productivity growth in the 1990s: technology, utilization, or adjustment?," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 117-165, December.
    16. Carlos Ocaña Pérez de Tudela, 1993. "Modelos dinámicos de competencia estratégica y cambio técnico: una panorámica," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 17(1), pages 43-63, January.
    17. Sander Wennekers & Roy Thurik & André Stel & Niels Noorderhaven, 2010. "Uncertainty Avoidance and the Rate of Business Ownership Across 21 OECD Countries, 1976–2004," Springer Books, in: Andreas Freytag & Roy Thurik (ed.), Entrepreneurship and Culture, chapter 0, pages 271-299, Springer.
    18. Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya, 2008. "Do Elections Slow Down Economic Globalization Process In India? It’S Politics Stupid !," MPRA Paper 10139, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Víctor Aguirregabiria, 1997. "Estimation of dynamic programming models with censored decision variables," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 21(2), pages 167-208, May.
    20. Meixing DAI, 2009. "On the role of money growth targeting under inflation targeting regime," Working Papers of BETA 2009-11, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ege:journl:v:12:y:2012:i:2:p:239-249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Baris Gök (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiegetr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.