IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eej/eeconj/v27y2001i4p391-407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Defense of Ignorance: On the Significance of a Neglected Form of Incomplete Information

Author

Listed:
  • Roger D. Congleton

    (Center for Study of Public Choice, George Mason University)

Abstract

Many contemporary theorists have stressed the importance of imperfect information for rational choice. However, they have not generally distinguished between two quite different notions of imperfect information. This paper compares and contrasts the search and ignorance conceptions of imperfect information, noting differences in their implications for market activity, welfare economics, and for the accumulation of knowledge. The analysis suggests that conventional probabilistic characterization of imperfect information can not fully capture the effects of imperfect knowledge on rational decision making nor on market activity. Ignorance must also be taken account of.

Suggested Citation

  • Roger D. Congleton, 2001. "In Defense of Ignorance: On the Significance of a Neglected Form of Incomplete Information," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 27(4), pages 391-407, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:27:y:2001:i:4:p:391-407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://web.holycross.edu/RePEc/eej/Archive/eeconj/Volume27/V27N4P391_407.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Information;

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory
    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eej:eeconj:v:27:y:2001:i:4:p:391-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Matheson, College of the Holy Cross (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eeaa1ea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.