IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/worbus/v60y2025i5s1090951625000537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How trade sanctions impact MNE subsidiaries in Russia: Responses to legitimacy concerns and performance

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Sihong
  • Michailova, Snejina

Abstract

How do MNE subsidiaries respond and perform after their home country imposes trade sanctions on the host country? To answer this research question, we apply a legitimacy lens, focus on Russia, and test four hypotheses using a dataset (1994–2022) that includes country, firm, and media data. Based on a sample of 676 MNE subsidiaries from 41 countries and text analysis of over 13,000 announcements, we find that sanctions increase subsidiaries’ stakeholder-oriented responses and negatively affect their performance. Subsidiaries with greater local experience are less likely to respond immediately, resulting in more severe performance declines compared to new entrants. Our analysis of news outlet posts further shows that negative public sentiment toward the sanctioning host country intensifies pressure on subsidiaries to respond. These findings enrich the international business literature on sanctions and contribute to ongoing scholarly discussions about the relationship between sanctions, legitimacy, and performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Sihong & Michailova, Snejina, 2025. "How trade sanctions impact MNE subsidiaries in Russia: Responses to legitimacy concerns and performance," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 60(5).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:worbus:v:60:y:2025:i:5:s1090951625000537
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2025.101664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951625000537
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jwb.2025.101664?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worbus:v:60:y:2025:i:5:s1090951625000537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620401/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.