IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wodepe/v40y2025ics2452292925000980.html

Institutional design and performance of land-based financing instruments: Evidence from local authorities in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Biitir, Samuel B.
  • Poku-Boansi, Michael
  • Bugri, John T.

Abstract

Rapid urbanisation in Ghana has increased the demand for serviced land and infrastructure, yet Metropolitan, Municipal, and District Assemblies (MMDAs) struggle to generate sufficient revenue. Land-based financing (LBF) instruments, such as property rates, developer obligations, and betterment charges, offer essential opportunities but are still underused. The study examined how institutional design and partisan politics influence the performance of LBF instruments in Ghana. Using 32 semi-structured interviews and policy document analysis across four MMDAs, the findings show that although the legal framework is promising in theory, actual implementation is hindered by election-year rate freezes, elite capture, outdated valuation rolls, and limited technical and enforcement capacity. While digitalisation and community participation offer opportunities for reform, their effects are uneven. The study contributes to existing knowledge by demonstrating how institutional design, when influenced by partisan politics, can transform potentially effective revenue tools into fragile practices, thereby enriching debates on fiscal federalism and the political economy of decentralisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Biitir, Samuel B. & Poku-Boansi, Michael & Bugri, John T., 2025. "Institutional design and performance of land-based financing instruments: Evidence from local authorities in Ghana," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:wodepe:v:40:y:2025:i:c:s2452292925000980
    DOI: 10.1016/j.wdp.2025.100753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452292925000980
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.wdp.2025.100753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:wodepe:v:40:y:2025:i:c:s2452292925000980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/world-development-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.