IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v5y1998i3p147-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land use and transportation: Envisioning regional sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Lewis III, Sherman L.

Abstract

This study of one region is in many ways relevant for others. In 1994, at the request of the Regional Alliance for Transit (RAFT), the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) used RAFT's assumptions in a run of its computer model of land use and transportation for the nine counties of the San Francisco, California, region. The RAFT run assumed the same population and employment growth for 2010 as MTC. RAFT assumptions combined a pricing reform, land use changes, and a shift of funds from freeways to transit. The pricing reform was to, in effect, pay employees the value of their "free" parking at work if they did not use it. The land use changes were to stop growth in the green belt and to revitalize neighborhoods and industries in transit-served areas. Funds were shifted from freeways to CalTrain upgrades, commuter rail, light rail, express bus services and local buses. RAFT proposed only three highway projects: one was to test against a competing freeway proposed in Hayward; a second for the I-238 bottleneck, and the third for Route 4 in Contra Costa. Regionally, performance was measured using many indices. For the Hayward project, it was measured in terms of mode choice, of level of service on highways, and of BART ridership. The RAFT plan performed significantly better than MTC's Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) on all measures regionally and in Hayward. MTC claimed it could not implement the RAFT plan, and RAFT responded to MTC. Despite limitations on its powers, MTC can still condition funding for transportation projects on land use, and can plan on the basis of market-based pricing reform and transit supported by land use and pricing reform. The problem is MTC's willingness to use the powers it has, which depends, in turn, on support from local governments.

Suggested Citation

  • Lewis III, Sherman L., 1998. "Land use and transportation: Envisioning regional sustainability," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 147-161, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:5:y:1998:i:3:p:147-161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967-070X(98)00015-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shoup, Donald C., 1992. "Cashing Out Employer-Paid Parking," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4548s6j5, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shoup, Donald C., 1999. "The trouble with minimum parking requirements," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 549-574.
    2. Clifford Cobb, 1999. "The Roads Aren’t Free," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 63-83, May.
    3. Shoup, Donald C., 1997. "Evaluating the effects of cashing out employer-paid parking: Eight case studies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 201-216, October.
    4. Shoup, Donald C., 1997. "Evaluating the Effects of Parking Cash Out: Eight Case Studies," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5nc6w2dj, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Lehner, Stephan & Peer, Stefanie, 2019. "The price elasticity of parking: A meta-analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 177-191.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:5:y:1998:i:3:p:147-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.