Author
Listed:
- Beck, Matthew J.
- Rose, John M.
- Pellegrini, Andrea
Abstract
Fare-free and low-fare public transport (FFPT) has shifted from a marginal idea to a visible policy in debates on transport equity, climate mitigation and cost-of-living relief. This paper reviews over 150 studies on FFPT and deep fare reductions, identified through a PRISMA-informed search of databases and grey literature. The review spans decades and covers empirical evaluations, theoretical work and policy analyses from Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Oceania. This review paper broadly addresses the main positive impacts of FFPT; key constraining factors; which groups benefit most, and under which conditions; and identifies research gaps. Across contexts, FFPT has been found to increase ridership and improve accessibility, particularly for low-income users, students and older adults, and can strengthen social inclusion and supports framing public transport as a public good. Evidence of substantial, durable modal shift from private cars, or of large emissions reductions, is limited and context dependent. Financial sustainability, capacity pressures and unintended social effects are recurrent challenges. The few studies estimating fare elasticities find that public transport demand is price-inelastic, so pricing is only one lever shaping travel behaviour. Persistent gaps include scarce longitudinal analyses, limited environmental measurement, regional bias towards Europe and North America, weak intersectional equity perspectives and incomplete understanding of how fare reform interacts with transport, land-use and welfare systems. Overall, FFPT improves accessibility and social equity, but its environmental and behavioural impacts are modest unless combined with broader strategies of service enhancement, demand management and integrated urban planning in diverse urban contexts.
Suggested Citation
Beck, Matthew J. & Rose, John M. & Pellegrini, Andrea, 2026.
"Taking a “free” ride: Where do we stand on free or low fare public transport and where do we go next?,"
Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:trapol:v:186:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x26002118
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104201
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:186:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x26002118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.