IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v185y2026ics0967070x26002283.html

Policy sandboxes for autonomous transportation in controlled environments: Evidence and insights from open-pit mining operations

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Ji
  • Xi, Yinfei
  • Qin, Hongmao
  • Wang, Chen
  • Zheng, Nan

Abstract

While the deployment of autonomous vehicles in complex urban settings remains constrained by safety bottlenecks and regulatory conservatism, controlled environments that are characterized by spatial confinement, centralized management, and high operational demand, have emerged as ideal sandboxes for accelerating policy and technological maturity. Among these, Autonomous Haulage Systems (AHS) in open-pit mining is one of the most mature and real-world implementations, recently demonstrated by the milestone delivery of over 300 Komatsu-brand AHS trucks to Rio Tinto. This maturity offers critical, yet underutilized, insights for bridging the gap between technological capabilities and governance frameworks. To this end, this paper aims to trace the evolution of knowledge, technology, and governance, and the future development in this field to inform broader autonomous transportation policies, through bibliometric analysis and topic modeling over 171 core research works that are published since 2015. The findings show that AHS development is embedded within a deeply interconnected academia–industry ecosystem, where innovations advance through iterative co-regulation rather than isolated experimentation typical of urban autonomous driving. Research history analysis reveals a definitive shift from a hardware-centric focus to cyber-physical system integration, specifically prioritizing interoperability standards, human–automation collaboration and application scalability. Moreover, the governance of these systems follows a “stepwise autonomy” pathway, where operational boundaries are expanded incrementally based on demonstrated performance, underpinned by risk-based oversight, structured safety validation, and communication robustness. The derived policy insights can inform other controlled environments (e.g., ports, airports, and industrial parks), while requiring targeted adaptation to mixed-traffic interfaces, safety exposure, temporal constraints, and institutional fragmentation. Overall, the study highlights how controlled environments can function as policy sandboxes that accelerate both technology maturity and regulatory learning toward safe and scalable autonomous mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Ji & Xi, Yinfei & Qin, Hongmao & Wang, Chen & Zheng, Nan, 2026. "Policy sandboxes for autonomous transportation in controlled environments: Evidence and insights from open-pit mining operations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:185:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x26002283
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X26002283
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104218?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:185:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x26002283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.