IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v183y2026ics0967070x26001563.html

User acceptance of urban air mobility sharing services: Evidence from the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Xie, Senkai
  • Liao, Feixiong

Abstract

This study examines the factors shaping user acceptance of shared urban air mobility (UAM) to combat transportation externalities. The proposed framework encompasses the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology along with additional factors, including trust, environmental awareness, perceived social status, and technophilia. A trust model is incorporated to capture perceived benefits and risks, regulatory support, and facilitating conditions. A multigroup analysis illustrates the moderating effects between people living in urban and non-urban areas. Empirical findings from the Netherlands reveal the crucial factors of user acceptance, and to our surprise, environmental awareness negatively impacts adoption. While price value and hedonic motivation are more important for non-urban residents, facilitating conditions, trust, and perceived social status are especially influential for urban residents. These results offer a refined explanation of UAM adoption in its early stages and underscore the need for differentiated strategies to cultivate user acceptance.

Suggested Citation

  • Xie, Senkai & Liao, Feixiong, 2026. "User acceptance of urban air mobility sharing services: Evidence from the Netherlands," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:183:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x26001563
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X26001563
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:183:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x26001563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.