IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v180y2026ics0967070x26000405.html

When rail matters most: policy impacts in China's freight "Modal shift from road to railway"

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Shuqi
  • Zhou, Huiyu

Abstract

Given the prevalence of excessive overloading in road freight and its associated environmental impacts, rail has become an increasingly ideal mode of freight transport. The Chinese government implemented the "modal shift from road to railway" policy to redirect bulk cargo transport from roads to railways. This study employs a causal forest approach to evaluate the policy's effects, revealing that it reduced transport costs by 12 %, eased road congestion by 4 %, improved traffic safety by 3 %, and mitigated environmental pollution by 23 %. The policy's effects exhibited regional heterogeneity, particularly on the southeastern side of the Hu Line (China's demographic divide). Furthermore, the present study adopted the partial dependence plots to assess the marginal effects of key drivers. Notably, in regions with a railway mileage of approximately 2320 km, continued expansion of railway infrastructure generates disproportionately high marginal benefits, suggesting an important policy window when rail matters most. The results offer evidence-based guidance and a replicable framework for implementing freight modal shift strategies in developing countries, emphasizing the importance of regionally differentiated policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Shuqi & Zhou, Huiyu, 2026. "When rail matters most: policy impacts in China's freight "Modal shift from road to railway"," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:180:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x26000405
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X26000405
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:180:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x26000405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.