IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v180y2026ics0967070x26000363.html

Policy pathways for autonomous shuttle adoption: Insights from UK focus groups

Author

Listed:
  • Makahleh, Hisham Y.
  • Johnson, Rachel
  • Shelton, Matthew
  • Ferranti, Emma J.S.
  • Rogers, Christopher D.F.

Abstract

Autonomous shuttles (AS) are positioned as environmentally sustainable first/last-mile mobility solutions, but deployments in the UK have so far been limited to short-term pilots. Although the Automated Vehicles Act 2024 has set out a regulatory framework for the future, continuing public trust, safety, accessibility, and governance issues constrain their longer-term take-up. This study explores such issues through four focus group discussions (n = 25) with local people living in the West Midlands, UK. Focus groups were held with users during a real-world trial at the National Exhibition Centre. A hybrid framework–thematic analysis was employed to explore both anticipated and emergent accounts. Key barriers included safety and reliability, low awareness and visibility, current lack of range and performance, issues with accessibility, and data privacy concerns. Enablers included AS being seen as good for the environment, a fun and novel experience, and the influence of peers. Acceptance of AS was also reported to be conditional on an operator being on board to reassure passengers. This study is among the first to link UK public perceptions during an operational AS trial with the emerging regulatory environment under the Automated Vehicles Act 2024. The real-world trial setting and inclusion of underrepresented users, including disabled participants, offer insights that extend beyond hypothetical acceptance studies. This is one of the earliest UK focus-group studies explicitly connecting lived trial experience to emerging AS policy pathways, and shows public accounts are less about the technical readiness of AS and more about their governance, integration, and service design. These insights are exploratory and reflect depth rather than statistical generalisation due to the qualitative design and sample size.

Suggested Citation

  • Makahleh, Hisham Y. & Johnson, Rachel & Shelton, Matthew & Ferranti, Emma J.S. & Rogers, Christopher D.F., 2026. "Policy pathways for autonomous shuttle adoption: Insights from UK focus groups," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:180:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x26000363
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X26000363
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:180:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x26000363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.